Sorry, for the insufficient explanation. I'll try again. You go from
the LFO's sine out into a VCF. Let's assume you take CV1 of the
A120. This input is calibrated to comply with the 1/V standard. The
sine output goes (just a guess) from -2,5 to +2,5 thus will swing
the freq. as if you would manually turn the freq pot over a wide
range. This is the current annoying situation. However, if you use
the CV2 or CV3 input you can attentuate the incoming sine wave with
it's corresponding CV-pot to any range inbtn. 0V and -/2,5V. The 2
attuators (CV2 and CV3) make of the missing output level control on
the LFO. Hope that helps, Ingo
--- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "danfarmer19732003"
<danfarmer@...> wrote:
>
> Hi again, thanks for your assistance but I'm afraid that I'm still
> not following.
>
> I have the following module and see no input to control the
> attenuation...
>
>
http://www.analoguehaven.com/doepfer/a145/
>
>
>
>
> --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "ilanode" <techmeier@> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, for posting this twice. just have realized I missed a
word
> > which is now added:
> >
> > Hello Dan, Doepfer LFO-modules have no level controll for the
output
> > but most (if not each) *module* have at least one input with a
> level
> > control (attentuator). The VCFs have usually one input without
> > attentuator (e.g. A122: CV1 for an 1/V response) and another one
> with
> > attentuator (e.g. CV2 for those CVs which does not need to comply
> > with the 1/V standard). Regards, Ingo (not selfoscilating)
> >
> >
> > --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "ilanode" <techmeier@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Dan, Doepfer LFO-modules have no level controll for the
> > output
> > > but most (if not each) have at least one input with a level
> > control
> > > (attentuator). The VCFs have usually one input without
> attentuator
> > > (e.g. A122: CV1 for an 1/V response) and another one with
> > > attentuator (e.g. CV2 for those CVs which does not need to
comply
> > > with the 1/V standard). Regards, Ingo (not selfoscilating)
> > >
> > > --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "danfarmer19732003"
> > > <danfarmer@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ingo... when you say...
> > > >
> > > > "you can simply attenuate the lfo output, that would be the
> > > simplest
> > > > solution."
> > > >
> > > > What exactly do you mean All I see on my LFO's is a rate
knob
> > > that
> > > > controls the rate of the LFO. Can you give me an example of
how
> > to
> > > > attenuate the output
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > hello dan,
> > > > >
> > > > > you can simply attenuate the lfo output,
> > > > > that would be the simplest solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > the more elaborated solution would be the use of
> > > > > one or two a172 max/min modules together with an
> > > > > a176 voltage source, thats what i'm doing quite often.
> > > > >
> > > > > best wishes
> > > > >
> > > > > ingo
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "danfarmer19732003"
> > > > > <danfarmer@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi guys... I'm looking for what I might call a range
> limiter
> > > for
> > > > my
> > > > > > LFOs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I want to do is limit the range of the LFO. For
> > example,
> > > if
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > controlling the cutoff filter with the LFO I do not want
> the
> > > > filter
> > > > > to
> > > > > > close the filter 100%, I just still want some sound(s)
to
> > come
> > > > > through.
> > > > > > I'm finding that as it is right now, there is no EFFECT
> > AMOUNT
> > > > > control
> > > > > > on the LFO's it just does a straight 0-100% range.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The opposite is true as well, in some case where I do
not
> > want
> > > > 100%
> > > > > of
> > > > > > the sounds to come through either. Meaning that I do not
> > want
> > > the
> > > > > LFO
> > > > > > opening up the cutoff filter 100%.... again some king of
> > > EFFECT
> > > > > AMOUNT
> > > > > > control would be useful to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can the Deopfer A-136 do this If not what other module
> can
> > I
> > > > was
> > > > > > thinking if I routed the LFO through a filter and if
that
> > > filter
> > > > > had
> > > > > > bandpass, that that might do what I want.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>