Wow! Hope this happens. This would open up a whole new part of the
module for us Mac guys. Thanks Danny.
Best Regards,
John
On 12/17/07 2:35 PM, "Daniel Ornelas" <
danny@...
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Howdy,
>
> I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
> acquired this module :)
>
> Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
>
> ~Danny
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <
hardware@...
> <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de> >
> <
hardware@...
<mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de> > wrote:
>
>>> >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
>>> >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
>>> >> their former users.
>> >
>> > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
>> > members of this group !
>> >
>> > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we
>> > have no
>> > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
>> > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
>> > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
>> > short-term
>> > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program
>> > such a
>> > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
>> >
>>> >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
>>> >> machine instead of a decorative item.
>> >
>> > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
>> > discussion on a
>> > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for
>> > the
>> > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
>> > cannot accuse
>> > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
>> > mind that
>> > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
>> > (8051
>> > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even
>> > the
>> > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
>> > display) limit
>> > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even
>> > with the
>> > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
>> >
>>> >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
>>> >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>> >
>> > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Dieter Doepfer
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
> Daniel Ornelas
>
danny@...
<mailto:danny%40anadeji.com>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]