In case I wrote anything that suggests I don't expect a sonic change
when changing the reverb tanks, I'm sorry. It's my poor command on any
language ;) I have not mentioned my sonic expectations.

My last message intention was to point out that the whole idea does
NOT stem from thinking the original reverb tank crap. Actually I think
it a good module and everyone on this list should seriously consider
to get one.
Asking for impedances and connectors (my original mail) should just
ensure that module and reverb tank meet each other's tech. specs.

"I'm believer." Ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Frequency Divider <freq.div@...>
wrote:

>
> believe me, any accutronics tank will sound *very* different. but also
> other belton tanks are worth checking out. they also have bigger models
> which again sound different from accutronics
>
>
> ilanode wrote:
> >
> >
> > Speaking on a possible reverb tank change: I just want to point out
> > that the module works fine with it's original tank. The idea is simply
> > to obtain a much longer decay - different sound might be fine but is
> > not the purpose.
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, <hardware@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm the one who was asking about the Accutronics tanks on the

Analogue

> > > > Haven forum... Dieter, can you confirm that we want the insulated
> > > > input and grounded output configuration
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > David
> > >
> > > Maybe it's not necessary but in the tanks we use for the A-199 the
> > inputs
> > > and outputs are insolated.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

------------------------------------------------------------------------

> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1242 - Release Date:

1/24/2008 8:32 PM

>