Dieter,
The second version looks good - if a little odd, but I feel that it
could make pulling the plugs out difficult if they are too close.
It will be interesting to see how the second prototype works out.
I'm excited by this module it will greatly add to the versatility of the
system
David
David Salter
Senior Consultant
PSG
Reuters Messaging:
david.salter.reuters.com@...
(t) +44 (0)20 7542 2402 | (m) 07990562402 | (f) 52699
Get the latest news at Reuters.com <
http://www.reuters.com/
>
________________________________
From:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
]
On Behalf Of
hardware@...
Sent: 04 February 2008 15:59
To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: AW: 1 patch matrix
> i agree with florian that the 8 outputs should be on
> the bottom or top of the matrix (even if the matrix
> should become 7x7 or 8x7).
> otherwise you loose much of the instant visual
> feedback, and gets quite confusing...
Look at the revised preliminary info page of the A-183-1. We added a
second
version with smaller distance between the sockets to obtain an 8x8
matrix
with outputs at the bottom. But for this version not all sockets can be
mounted with nuts. We will have to built a second prototype to find out
if
the stability is sufficient. It may work if the holes for the sockets in
the
panel have exactly the same diameter as the threads of the sockets (i.e.
no
gaps).
Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer
This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company.
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Limited.
Reuters Limited is part of the Reuters Group of companies, of which Reuters Group PLC is the ultimate parent company.
Reuters Group PLC - Registered office address: The Reuters Building, South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5EP, United Kingdom
Registered No: 3296375
Registered in England and Wales
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]