hi joe, well said .
regards,
RM

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "buechlerjoe" <buechlerjoe@t...> wrote:
> I remember feeling frustrated a while back because the group was
> dominated by discussion of the touch controller. It didn't interest
> me, so I felt left out. I even considered posting something to the
> effect that the touch controller isn't an A100 module and shouldn't
> be discussed so much, but thought better of it in the end.
>
> Using the A100 in conjunction with other equipment is one of the
> most fascinating aspects of modular systems to explore, in my mind.
If
> someone here produces great music by patching in external audio, or
an
> insert or pedal effect, or a controller, or another synth with CV
> inputs, I love to hear about it! Lots of people use their modular
> system strictly for processing external sources, rather than as a
> synth.
>
> There's even one group member here who doesn't own any audio
modules
> at all - his A100 is dedicated to modulating his Waldorf Q. What a
> great idea! It would be a shame if he had felt constrained not to
> discuss it, we never would have heard about it.
>
> I feel that anyone who is being creative, and using electronic
music
> gear in ways that the manufacturer never intended, is doing
something
> right. So if Dieter doesn't think that the Regelwerk is an
extension
> of the A100, then fine, I know something that he doesn't.
>
> Joe
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45" <ringmod45@y...> wrote:
> > hi paul, thanks for understanding. i seem to be the most vocal on
> the
> > issue. i did not take it personally, i was just trying to keep
the
> > doors open to discussion. if we close our minds, it won't help us
in
> > the long run. these machines do need an upgrade, in the future
they
> > might help you or other users with their A100 systems.
> >
> > people are conservative only when they don't explore other
avenues
> of
> > thought and simply fellow the normal mass culture way of doing
> > things. thereby you having an A100 constitutes the exact opposite
of
> > convservative. keep exploring and enjoy life. thanks and cheers.
> >
> > may the force be with you, :)
> > rm
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Paul Schulz" <dasfonk@w...> wrote:
> > > Hi ringmod,
> > >
> > > >please do not take this as a flame.
> > > No problem with that, I am not inflammable ;-)
> > >
> > > To clarify it, it was NOT my intention to disrespect neither
the
> > *werks´ users nor the machines themself. Don´t take it personal.
If
> > anyone feels hurt - sorry about that!!!
> > >
> > > Highest regards to anyone here who tries to make things move at
> > Doepfer. That´s the fantastic aspect about this group - having
> > influence on the manufacturer´s decisions. And much respect goes
out
> > to ripe101 (and everybody else) who is willing to re-write
> > Schaltwerk´s code; now that is what I call a hardcore
enthusiast :-)
> > Instead of getting alternative gear (if there´s something like
this)
> > you try to hack the brain of this machine - wow!
> > >
> > > Opinions may differ what is on- or off-topic, but as you
> > mentioned "you have the ability to not read them if you wish."
> True,
> > true. Maybe I am a little too conservative in this point...
(Gosh,
> > did I really describe myself as conservative At my young
age... ;-)
> > >
> > > have a nice day, y´all
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]