From what I can tell, the 102 is basically identical to the 120 in
functionality, obviously the main difference is 102 is diode, and 120
is moog style. What's the difference sonically Is the 102 harsher
sounding It does more drastic things to the sound than the moog style

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , achtung_999
<heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:

>
> My first filter was the A108, which is basically the deluxe version

of the

> A120, not the cheapest one but a beatiful filter.My favourite filter

however

> is the A102, got 2 of those.
> And I really love the Wasp filter.
>
> I have more but these are my top selection.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:20 PM, zoog_angelspit
> <zoog_angelspit@...>wrote:
>
> > I also love industrial music...here's my thoughts:
> >
> > I own the AS-500E (EMS Synthi Clone) that you mentioned. it is
> > AWESOME!!! it's a diode filter.
> >
> > Doepfer also do a Doide filter called A-102...and i think it's their
> > BEST filter...really unique and awesome sound - LOVE IT!
> > it can be warm and juicy or cold and harsh....it's got the wildest
> > RES on it! ...and it's one of thier cheapest filters.
> >
> > A-120 is not my favourite...it's a little plain.
> >
> >
> > > For example, you can get a low pass filter, high pass filter
> > > or band pass filter. Is there a Doepfer module that maybe has
> > > all 3 combined where it's
> >
> > A-124 WASP filter is a 3 in one...and it's also brilliant. very harsh
> > and distinctive sound.
> >
> > > Also, I've heard mention of "sub-oscillators" somewhere.
> >
> > the A-115 is kind-of a sub oscillator...it gives you several "sub
> > octives" to fatten the sound up. it's inexpensive and very useful.
> >
> > we have a few YouTube thingies that use heaps of Doepfer stuff:
> > http://www.angelspit.net/blipvert/
> >
> > Doepfer stuff is BRILLIANT for modulating and doing "tricky stuff"...!
> >
> > ROCK!
> >
> > ZooG.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>