of course experimentation is the name of the game: but this thread did come from me asking if there was anyone making modules with VC feedback and VC mix so don't shoot me for wanting to have them on a future doepfer module! I want something to mount it in a beauty case as an independent delay processor so there won't be much room for so many other modules

I personally want a machine to perform on and full modularity is not always the best solution for that, which is why I love the VCS3, certain Analogue Solutions modules which tend to cram in a lot of CV control along with prepatched VCAs mixers - also the Mooger Foogers do this. I'd like a very flexible delay to modulate the shit out of with analogue sequencers and that I don't need to use external VCAs and mixers everytime i use it... maybe the Harvestman and Analogue Systems modules will be better for me... though twice or more the cost

of course having something simple and cheap will be a more friendly idea to other users


Richard

----- Original Message -----
From: achtung_999
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: 1 Re: VC controlled delay


I understand your point completely, and I would like VC feedback also.But I
was mainly trying to push the people to think more before they start to
inflate and overfeaturize cheap modules that Dieter suggests.

;-)

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Denis Gökdag < q-art@... > wrote:

> sure, i see your point in general, but adding two sockets for the
> feedback insert isn't a lot of work/space/money and definitely no
> roland-JV-erising thing ;-)
>
> especially with VC feedback being a pretty common task you can save a
> lot of patching with these two sockets. all you need to do is insert
> a VCA, eliminating a mixer in front of the delay input and a multiple
> at the module output (which, being unbuffered, isn't such a phantastic
> option in terms os sound quality, depending on what else is fed by
> this chain). in terms of signal fidelity you also benefit: one less
> amplification/mixing stage in the signal path (as there already *is* a
> mixer in the delay module that sums input and feedback).
>
> to me, "modular" means flexible, not "tedious" ;-)
>
> my 2 opamps,
> d
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2008, at 1:31 PM, achtung_999 wrote:
> >
> >> Come on.You have a modular synthesizer. Experiment!
> >> I'm getting a bit worried about the ongoing trend on this list.
> >> The trend of people wanting modules that have all the options build
> >> in.
> >> Too much build in features are beyond the scope of a modular.
> >
> > .
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 945 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]