no problem. just tell me what the 'slimmer version' should have.
Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
1 group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, Stu Grimshaw <
grimshaw@...
> wrote:
From: Stu Grimshaw <
grimshaw@...
>
Subject: 1 Re: Sampler CV/Gate Recorder - was: bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 modules!
To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 3:40 PM
hi florian, bakis,
> > gate (not trigger) for play/record
> replace this by:
> gate(+switch) for run/stop
> gate(+switch) to select between single shot / loop mode
> gate(+switch) to switch from gated mode to so called "release-mode" (if
> in single shot, the sample should be played to the end; if in loop
mode,
> the loop should be played endlessly until the next start/retrigger is
> given).
i'm personally not a fan of leaving running, looping, one-shotting and
stopping to the sampler, i think gating it continuously allows more
control.
> trigger(+momentary- switch) for restart
would a start trigger not do the same anyway if the module were to be
controlled by gates (see above) then a retrigger input would indeed
make sense.
>
> > gate to select play or record
> This record setting should be an pre-enable setting; the real write
> setting should be done by the start signal.
i agree. you've put it more clearly than i did.
i think there is a danger here of loading the thing up with so many
features that it becomes a small minority's perfect module, but
unnecessarily expensive for most others - especially those who would
potentially buy four or more, interesting though many of these ideas
are. i suppose it's a matter of taste, but maybe bakis, you could
include a slimmer version in the poll
stu
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]