hi florian,
can you integrate this suggestion of yours with your own original idea about this module
i am a bit lost.
what do you use the vc addresscounter submodule for
for the two independent outputs (ping pong delayes, etc...)
Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
1 group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece
--- On Sat, 11/1/08, Florian Anwander <
fanwander@...
> wrote:
From: Florian Anwander <
fanwander@...
>
Subject: Re: 1 Sampler CV/Gate Recorder - was: bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 modules!
To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, November 1, 2008, 5:19 PM
Hi Christophe
> I'd like to have the module to record and play at the same time, so,
> having one gate for record and another for play.
> [...]
> This would
> require one extra feature: a cross fade between the old and new
> sample-play position.
> [...]
> Same type of crossfade would be desirable if the record mode starts in
> the middle of the sample (crossfade between old and new sound).
Those suggestions require heavy hardcore DSP programming.
A simple sampler could be achieved much easier by an A/D-converter, a
clocked counter and a SRAM chip. Dieter did this in the SSS-modules 20
years ago.
> It would be great if negative voltages would lead to the sample being
> played backwards.
cute idea, but assumingly not easy to achieve (at least in an exact
reproducable way).
> Why not have two outputs with independent positions Opens
> possibilities for ping-pong delays, as well as stereo chorussing,
> a loop playing in canon and the monitoring function.
Very fine idea. This would require to have the same clock, but
independant address counters. This leads again to a even more modulized
version: separate modules for
- highspeed VCO module,
- VC addresscounter module,
- A/D-RAM-D/A module
> I think the independent input, output and monitoring would make it a
> real live performer, and that is how I like to use my modular!
Definitely true
Florian
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]