hmm sounds very interesting..

wish i had a 147 to try this.
what happens when you retrig the 147 with a divided-down midi
clock that's heavily attenuated or to somehow 'override' the
retrig periodically w ADSR cv (a job for 166 ) or perhaps
mutate the divided-down clock signal somehow to make it hard
for the 147 to be retrig'd consistently, but still within adequate
relation to tempo, if somewhat random.. there might be a
combination w just enough tempo info and conflicting length info
to keep things half on/off track.

i imagine that if you had true sync, the step length control values
from the 155 might get stale once quantized. (that is, if it's even
possible). but that's better than not having step length control at
all. i'm having a tough time getting my head around a patch that
allows this 155>147>155 loop within a tempo grid.

which reminds me..i often wish for a way to catch or
record-and-loop odd/quasi-random cv control signal cycles
within patches such as these. many times during a
semi-random response from the 155, the perfect rhythmic
phrase comes out for a few cycles but is just too irregular overall
so it gets recorded and edited later as audio. i wonder if it's
possible to make something like a cv 'repeater' (you know, like
that electrix thingy) to run on the output of the 155 (or whatever)
so we can more easily break/destroy the 16th note grid and stay
in sync.

with all this automatic bpm, self-looping audio software out
there..i can't help but fantasize about something that can loop
record and regenerate cv rather than audio.

but back to the subject, very interested in joe's idea here.

-duff




--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "buechlerjoe" <buechlerjoe@t...>
wrote:

> I did some earlier experiments clocking the A155 from the

A147. Its

> really quite powerful, being able to control the duration of each

step

> using the bottom row of A155 knobs.
>
> I'd like to get back to this, and I'm trying to think of a way to sync
> it up with midi. Has anyone devised a workable approach to

this

>
> Joe