Sounds good in theory but the external tri-to-sine most probably not perform well. The
converters will have calibrated by the user to *each* specific oscillator triangle wave
patched in. I doubt most would bother pull out the module, hook up a scope trim the
calibration pots every time they patch a new wave!

Making a tri-to-buzzy-sine external converter is more practical sine it requires NO
calibration to make the conversion. This way you can get even get this buzzy wave with
other vendors oscillators (Plan-B, Z0, ASys).

And it frees Doepfer to make higher quality oscillators without complaints from the small
band who use this crappy "sine" wave.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Adam-V" <adam-v@...> wrote:
>
> The other bonus would be the ability to patch in oscillators other
> than the A110/111.
>
> For those not wanting to add modules for this purpose perhaps both
> types of conversion could be offered on the oscillator board itself
> with a user selectable link to pre-set whichever version of sine is
> required I wouldn't think it would add that much more to the cost of
> the module to do this would it
>
> Cheers,
> Adam-V
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@> wrote:
> >
> > nice idea!
> >
> > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> > 1 group owner
> > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> > www. DiN. org. uk
> > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> > www. shimarecords. co. uk
> > www. rubberrecords. gr
> > Athens - Greece
> >
> > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, James Husted <ersatzplanet@> wrote:
> >
> > From: James Husted <ersatzplanet@>
> > Subject: Re: AW: 1 Re: Let me hear your bright new
> ideas for future Doepfer A100 module
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 8:30 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This would be a good solution because I would imagine you can plug
> > other waveforms than a triangle to get odd shaped waves for outputs.
> > Would that work too
> > -James
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:55 AM, yahoo@doepfer. de wrote:
> >
> > > > How about a basic triangle to sine wave shaper module It could have
> > > > Triangle In, Original Triangle Out and the best possible Sine Out
> > > that
> > > > can be achieved. You could even fit two of them onto a 4HP panel.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Adam-V
> > >
> > > Good idea. This would not require to solder a module to install the
> > > modification. And every user could decide if he wants a better sine
> > > or not.
> > > But it would be more expensive than the internal modifications
> > > because it's
> > > mostly the mechanics (front panel, sockets, potentiometers and
> > > knobs) that
> > > is responible for the price of a module. The internal modification
> > > would be
> > > in the Euro 10-20 range, whereas the prise of the module version
> > > would be at
> > > least in the Euro 50 range for a dual tri-to-sine converter.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>