I would have thought that, assuming the correct triangle amplitude was
applied, it shouldn't matter what the source of the waveform was. I
base this on a quick look at Tim's schematic and associate blurb and
am happy to be corrected if I am wrong.

Cheers,
Adam-V

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "laryn91" <caymus91@...> wrote:
>
> Sounds good in theory but the external tri-to-sine most probably not
perform well. The
> converters will have calibrated by the user to *each* specific
oscillator triangle wave
> patched in. I doubt most would bother pull out the module, hook up a
scope trim the
> calibration pots every time they patch a new wave!
>
> Making a tri-to-buzzy-sine external converter is more practical sine
it requires NO
> calibration to make the conversion. This way you can get even get
this buzzy wave with
> other vendors oscillators (Plan-B, Z0, ASys).
>
> And it frees Doepfer to make higher quality oscillators without
complaints from the small
> band who use this crappy "sine" wave.
>
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Adam-V" <adam-v@> wrote:
> >
> > The other bonus would be the ability to patch in oscillators other
> > than the A110/111.
> >
> > For those not wanting to add modules for this purpose perhaps both
> > types of conversion could be offered on the oscillator board itself
> > with a user selectable link to pre-set whichever version of sine is
> > required I wouldn't think it would add that much more to the cost of
> > the module to do this would it
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Adam-V
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
> > <synth_freak_2000@> wrote:
> > >
> > > nice idea!
> > >
> > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> > > 1 group owner
> > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> > > www. DiN. org. uk
> > > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> > > www. shimarecords. co. uk
> > > www. rubberrecords. gr
> > > Athens - Greece
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, James Husted <ersatzplanet@> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: James Husted <ersatzplanet@>
> > > Subject: Re: AW: 1 Re: Let me hear your bright new
> > ideas for future Doepfer A100 module
> > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 8:30 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This would be a good solution because I would imagine you can plug
> > > other waveforms than a triangle to get odd shaped waves for
outputs.
> > > Would that work too
> > > -James
> > >
> > > On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:55 AM, yahoo@doepfer. de wrote:
> > >
> > > > > How about a basic triangle to sine wave shaper module It
could have
> > > > > Triangle In, Original Triangle Out and the best possible
Sine Out
> > > > that
> > > > > can be achieved. You could even fit two of them onto a 4HP
panel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Adam-V
> > > >
> > > > Good idea. This would not require to solder a module to
install the
> > > > modification. And every user could decide if he wants a better
sine
> > > > or not.
> > > > But it would be more expensive than the internal modifications
> > > > because it's
> > > > mostly the mechanics (front panel, sockets, potentiometers and
> > > > knobs) that
> > > > is responible for the price of a module. The internal
modification
> > > > would be
> > > > in the Euro 10-20 range, whereas the prise of the module version
> > > > would be at
> > > > least in the Euro 50 range for a dual tri-to-sine converter.
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes
> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>