It could be done with just 2 VCA's, one for even numbered steps, one for
odd. A clock divider would just switch the odd one every other click while
the even channel is on, and vice versa. You could just use one lag
generator. You could have two fixed voltages of equal magnitude but
opposite polarity in the background, and the clock signal would switch
between them while the lag would swing between those values, split the
output and send it to the CV of one VCA, and send an inverted output to the
CV of the other.

So it seems like to do this with existing modules as I've described would
require 1 lag, 3 VC switches, 2 clock dividers, 1 A134 panner, 1 fixed CV
source, and 1 inverter (or skip the inverter and use a carefully tuned
A176). Now if the lag time is shorter than the clock cycle then the effect
would be to always hear a mix and then some abrupt changes while the
outgoing signal is switched. So you wouldn't want to set the lag time too
long.

So it can be done using existing A100 technology (if I have not made a
mistake in my reasoning), but it seems like the kind of thing that calls for
consolidation to one module for a useful and intuitive function.

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:22 PM, < james.husted@... > wrote:

>
>
> That might be an expensive module - lots of VCAa and Lag/envelope circuits.
> Probable easier done using Vactrols driven by a A-160/A-161 type circuit
> with some lag added to smooth the transitions further than the Vactrol's
> built in lag.
> -James
>
> On May 13, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Monroe Eskew wrote:
>
> > Module suggestion: Similar to sequential switch, except there would be a
> > crossfade instead of instant step between successive channels. Crossfade
> > time to be set by a knob, selectable from 0 to long.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]