I had a custom case made up for the 650 and for now I am using a +/- 15 VDC
linear power supply I had on hand as well as a 5VDC regulator board I picked
up from synthdotcom and modified for this. so it is a little bit of a
project but the module is worth it. I have an MFOS dual power supply I'd
like to use for this but it doesn't seem to be working properly right now
:(

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:46 PM, ricardo < rrkrdo@... > wrote:

>
>
> MOTM 650 midi to CV for my modular arpeggiator, i'll check that.
> What's the smaller size MOTM case and power supply I think it is the 5
> unit row right
>
> Thanks for the useful info
> ric
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , dancemachine <dancemachine@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > i ended up going with a MOTM 650 midi to CV for my modular arpeggiator.
> > was a bit of a pain cause i had to get a case and power supply but the
> midi
> > to cv and arpeggiator functions in it seem to be superior to any other
> > modular options at this time.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:51 AM, zaum <zaum@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Take a look at the Quantimator.
> > > http://www.toppobrillo.com/quantimator.html It
> > > > > can do chords and arpeggios.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Does anyone have the A156 dual quantizer
> > > > Can it makes arpeggios like juno 60 or better
> > >
> > > The A156 does not have an arpeggiator, it's a only a pair of
> quantitizers.
> > > The A-190-1 has MIDI going in. Since the MIDI can be polyphonic,
> software
> > > can pull an arpeggiated mono CV from it. That's going on in the MIDI to
> CV
> > > module though it doesn't have all the features some arpeggiators offer.
> > >
> > > I'm not convinced the Quantimator is actually an arpeggiator at all. I
> > > don't have one so I don't know for sure but I think I'd call it a
> > > Quantitized Analog Shift Register. The difference is how it's played.
> To me
> > > you play chords into an arpeggiator, this seems to remember the current
> and
> > > last 2 mono notes played. Correct Not that it isn't cool but it's a
> new
> > > hybrid twist, not a proper arpeggiator though the output might resemble
> one
> > > to a degree.
> > >
> > > Traditionally an arpeggiator starts with a polyphonic keyboard and
> pulls a
> > > clocked stream of notes from the polyphonic info. They were hardly ever
> on
> > > modular systems because few started with a poly keyboard and then added
> the
> > > circuitry for one (Roland's poly keyboard for the 100M modular was a
> vintage
> > > exception). In other words it's not something traditionally in a
> modular
> > > module, it's re-interpreting a scanned (poly) keyboard connected to it.
> > >
> > > An analog shift register stores the last monophonic note played in a
> new
> > > register (location). It's like a S&H in that it grabs and holds a
> current
> > > voltage value but more complicated in that it remembers a prior voltage
> too
> > > and several ASRs can be chained to remember several prior voltages. As
> a new
> > > voltage is grabbed the old ones shift outputs.
> > >
> > > As I said, maybe I don't have a quantimator, but I don't see how you
> could
> > > get the same functionality without a polyphonic input . Though I guess
> you
> > > could play something with single keys one at a time on a poly keyboard
> in
> > > latch mode that are subsequently arpeggiated. I mention that because
> maybe
> > > latch input arpeggiation isn't far functionally from this module's
> input,
> > > but still, this scenario is still re-processing a poly keyboard and to
> > > answer your question the input doesn't seem like it's similar to a Juno
> 60.
> > >
> > > Actually for many years I thought I was hearing arpeggiation on 1970s
> > > recordings (I think the first commercial keyboard with an arpeggiator
> was
> > > 1978). What it turns out I was hearing was a sequencer being transposed
> live
> > > by keyboard CV. That technique was not the same as an arpeggiator
> either but
> > > is worth keeping in mind if you don't have one, though in the age of
> MIDI to
> > > CV a software arpeggiator is the easiest way to go imho.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]