If you want small, this will probably come sooner then the curious thing Dieter is planning...
 Malekko Q-ASR:
http://muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php t=19495&start=all&postdays=0&postorder=asc
 I already have the Ken Stone ASR. Love it.
 John.
 On 2 Aug 2011, at 21:35, achtung_999 wrote:
 > Nice that it is growing and growing.
 > But I just asked for a simple and small module with a reasonable price.
 > I sense an A-152-2 coming up
 > Massive real-estate.. etc etc
 > I don't need the midi/usb function. There are nice midi>cv converters in the
 > Doepfer catalogue.. etc etc..
 > Heck, I will not even use it for arpeggios. I like the idea of a shift
 > register for abstract/noisy patches..
 >
 > In other words: When is there a price/HP estimation
 > Sorry to be a party pooper... learned another lesson: be careful what you
 > wish for.
 > It will probably end that I have to order the Ken Stone pcbs :-(
 >
 > Ernst
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:58 PM, <
yahoo@...
> wrote:
 >
 >> **
 >>
 >>
 >>> Hello
 >>>
 >>>> memory that could be "filled" in different ways. E.g. from a CV
 >>> source via
 >>>> AD conversion (the usual ASR) but also via Midi or USB. The ring memory
 >>>> could be looped or not by means of a simple switch.
 >>> Stupid question: Isn't a ASR filled by MIDI a polyphonic MIDI/CV
 >>> interface (for full functionality would two ASR would be required, one
 >>> for CV and one for Gate).
 >>>
 >>> Florian
 >>
 >> Florian,
 >>
 >> maybe all has to do with the fact that I'm currently working on the
 >> redesign
 >> of the polyphonic CV interface (A-190-5). It has also 16 DAC outputs
 >> available (four of them will be used as gates) and that's hardware
 >> structure
 >> similar to a 16-fold ASR. I think with the corresponding assign algorithm
 >> the polyphonic CV interface can be treated as an ASR filled by Midi note
 >> messages.
 >>
 >> Dieter
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 >
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------------
 >
 > Yahoo! Groups Links
 >
 >
 >
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]