Joe,

Excellent, this will prove to be very useful.

Regards



David Salter
Reuters Consulting
Tel: +44 20 7542 2402
Mob: +44 7990562402
Fax: +44 20 7542 2699

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Buechler [mailto: buechlerjoe@... ]
Sent: 23 September 2002 21:46
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 1 Re: voltage range of all the a100 CV cources


According to my cheapo voltmeter (which has an analog dial hehe):

A165: 0 to 9V
A160: 0 to 10V
A147 -4.5 to +4.5V
A155 Gate: 0 to 10V
A155 CV top: 0 to 4V
A155 CV bottom: 0 to 7V
A190 Gate: 0 to 9V
A191 LFO: -5 to +5V
A191 CV: 0 to 5V
A141: 0 to 6V
A162: 0 to 10V
A140: 0 to 7V
A119 Gate: 0 to 8V
A119 Env: 0 to 8.5V
A176: 0 to 5.5V
A145: -5 to +5V

I seem to recall Timothy did a more comprehensive list earlier when
the A150 bleed-thru issue was being discussed.

Joe (not a wizard)

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> hi list,
> these goes to all the a100 modular "wizard" users:
> can any of you send a list to the group including the
> voltage range of all the a100 cv cources(the
> lfo's,adsr's,sequencers,vco's,trigger
> outputs,etc...).this would be very usefull to all of
> us, because many users would like to connect other
> analog synths to the cv cources of the a100...(i would
> like to connect it to my VCS3 cv inputs,but,first,i
> would like to know the voltage range,so as not to
> destroy my VCS3.)
> bakis.
>
>
>
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> 1 group owner-moderator
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > .




------------------------------------------------------------- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]