great, thanks for this!

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
>
> my friend Ingo, and then me, are doing this for years. its the tighter sync you can get.
>
> yes, set midi clips with 16th notes and use the gate out of any midi-cv interface as clock signal to sync your analog sequencer.
>
> if you have a second midi-cv channel, you can do the same technique and use the gate (coming from the midi notes from the midi-cv interface) of that channel, as a reset signal for your analog modules.
>
> so, you can have a clock that is as low or high rate as you want and a reset signal that can occur whenever you want.
>
>  
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> 1 group owner
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> www. facebook. com/ pages/Parallel-Worlds/192093934136476
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> www. DiN. org. uk
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: re_qu <renato.quaroni@...>
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 11:00 AM
> Subject: 1 A-190-2 as clock
>
>
>
>  
> Hi
>
> I'm running ableton 8 right now. I understand that it's midi sync has some issues in terms of keeping a tight clock.
>
> but i heard rumours that version 9 has improved...
>
> Assuming it hasn't... the clock from the A-190-1, synced by live 8 (or 9 ), is not going to be much use to me.
>
> but i had heard of a work around; that essentially setting up a midi clip with midi on each beat and then using the CV data to clock is much more reliable and keeps tight.
>
> can anyone confirm or deny then i wouldn't need the A-190-1 and could get the A-190-2, obviously cheaper and using less HP.
>
> thanks,
> renato
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>