> Nina and I have figured out a way of making it smoother in a way
> that's more predictive than changing things after the fact. It
> doesn't involve slew limiting. It's inherently imperfect but for
> most practical purposes should be the most useful solution. It's
> less elegant under the hood, but the outcome should be good.
> She's a bit more tight lipped than me though, so I'd have to run
> it past her before divulging all our secrets. :)

I see ! Sounds promising.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer