Hi there,

I have both the 145 & 145 and would say that they are different enough
to say that either is a valid option.

The 145 is nice because like the 146 it has the range control. Being
able to have rising and falling sawtooth at the same time is great
because it means that in a dual VCA or VCF situation you can simulate a
pseudo cross fade (one opening while the other closes).

The 147's main benefit is the VC control of frequency, this allows the
modulation rate to vary by patching in another LFO or envelope. Great
for sounds that evolve in interesting ways instead of in a repetitive
way.

Both have a sine out which is wonderful for vibrato. VC vibrato using
the 147 is even more expressive (if you have a 174 joystick).

Regards



David Salter
Reuters Consulting
Tel: +44 20 7542 2402
Mob: +44 7990562402
Fax: +44 20 7542 2699

-----Original Message-----
From: rwert [mailto: musicagenera@... ]
Sent: 04 November 2002 15:50
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 1 A145 <>A147


hi
I am quite new user of A100
I want to buy next LFO
and I have problem to choose between A145 and A147
may be you help me a litle bit to decide
if theres makes sense to but 30 euro more expensive 147
(I have already use A146)
thanks
r


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > .




------------------------------------------------------------- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]