--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Joe Buechler" <buechlerjoe@t...> wrote:

> I guess I was just remarking to myself that a VCO could be used in
> the same way as the proposed A154 clock source. It hadn't occurred
> to me to patch an A110 to the A155 clock input to get PWM. I tried
> it this morning.
>
> Nonetheless, the proposed A154 clock source has the same issues as

you

> have when using the A147 (or VCO) to clock the A155 - no

quantization

> and no midi sync.

hi joe,

if you use the A190 clock out as the source for the A154 shouldn't
this give midi sync.

here is one issue i would like to know further about. if you are
using a midi sequencer as you master and you use the A190 to drive
the A154 or A155, how would it start the A154 and or A155's in sync

the reason i ask is that i use a TR909 rimshot trigger out as a
source to drive the A155. the plus side to this is you could the
rimshot trigger out as a quantizer as well, program all 16 steps and
drives the A155 in time, etc..it also starts and stops the A155 in
sync.

will this be the same, if you use the A190 start and stop the A155

>
> I guess what I want in the A154, instead of a clock source, is a VC
> divider with PWM. Is that feasible
>
> Joe

i hear you, that would be a nice feature to have. it would be nice to
have Mr.Doepfer input and ideas this one, as well other members on
the list.

RM

>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45" <ringmod45@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >> I still prefer the idea of the VC divider on the clock input
> side,
> > and
> >
> > >you could place the A160/161 right beside the A154 to sastify
> > function.
> >
> > the only problem is, you would have to patch the clock division

you

> > wanted. A vc divider could be interesting.
> >
> > how about using the A163 as well
> >
> > also having divide down clocks from the out outputs could be

useful,

> > i.e. 2 to, 1 to 1, 1 to 2, 1 to 4 etc.
> >
> > regards,
> > RM