previous | index | next |
<< | topic list | >> |
On 12 Feb 2015, at 14:12, achtung_999 heinrich.himmelwasser@... 1 < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote:
Oh and, Neil, some more detail, last post was a bit fast:
just did a quick test.This is the result from slow to fast:
A147 is slowest but can be voltage controlled! (i own 3, love it)
A146
A145
A143-9 is faster than the a145 when inputting some CV on top of the highest knob setting.
Next to this, as an LFO collector I own a Pittsburgh LFO2 which has 2 (non cv controllable) LFOs in.
And the bottom half of that goes well into audio range. Not as high as the 145 and 143-9 though.
I also own a few Analogue Systems RS80s.. (also 3 actually)..
Love that one, and it goes also well into audiorange.
Also not as high as the 2 fastest Doepfers though...
Hope this helps
Ernst
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Neil Kagan blinkenlicht@... 1 < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote:
I have the other three, including the A-143-9 and yes it's great! Shame the other two cant get up to the same rate as the PW function is so useful.
Neil
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Feb 2015, at 13:59, achtung_999 heinrich.himmelwasser@... 1 < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote:
I can answer about the LFOs I have in my system:
A145 is the fastest yes. The 146 and 147 are much slower.
The A143-9 is also very fast.
And with a small modification it's a nice sine VCO that can be used for linear FM.
I can highly recommend the A143-9 !
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Neil Kagan blinkenlicht@... 1 < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote:
Ok, can someone tell me which Doepfer LFO has the fastest available rate It seems the A-145 does, having read the manuals.
Neil
Sent from my iPhone