--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "code_pig" <code_pig@y...> wrote:

> What about the A191's MIDI clock sync'ed LFO

My A191 doesn't have a CV input jack. Where on the A191 shall I patch
the Pre Out jack of the A155 to, in order to control step length

The same applies to the MCV24 and A190.

>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45" <ringmod45@y...> wrote:
> > hi Joe, i think you just solved the problem, hypothethically
> speaking.
> > the A190 does have a software LFO in it. now, the only snag is

that

> > it is only free running.
> >
> > a couple of questions to Mr.Doepfer.
> >
> > would it be possible to have the software LFO sync to midi clock
> >
> > would the software LFO be accurate enough to perform as a clock
> > source for the A154
> >
> > would it be possible to have a divider for the software Lfo
> >
> > if the A190 could be somehow reprogrammed to have the LFO sync,
> this
> > would solve problem, i guess.
> >
> > Joe, i am currently using The Encore Expressionist, it has 3 LFO's
> > which can be modulated on separate midi channels and has a re-trig
> > parameter to sync the LFO to the number of midi clocks that are
> > inputted into the Expressionist.
> >
> > i think, IIRC, you mentioned before that you own the MCV 24. if

the

> > MCV 24 has sync LFO's, you could probably use the MCV24 to do the
> job.
> >
> > regards,
> > RM
> >
> > .
> > >
> > > I'm not an engineer, maybe a VC clock divider idea isn't the
> right
> > > approach. It isn't obvious that the change in divisor would be
> fast
> > > enough to control the sequencer accurately. Perhaps a software
> LFO
> > > that can either be synced to a master clock or free-running, and
> > whose
> > > rate can be adjusted in increments by a control voltage.
> > >
> > > Joe