> Ooops! Had more of think about this, and realised I was confusing
the
> 148 with the freeze/follow of the 129/5...
No, no, no, bad boy! 129/_3_ of course... (oh dear, one of those
days). So maybe there is a solution with a 129/4 and 129/3 I'll
experiment and see how 'laggy' the signal is out of the 129/3.