I edited the poll to go after Kevins excellent sketches so please vote again
now for more clarity.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys id=11076862

----- Original Message -----
From: "code_pig" < code_pig@... >
To: < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:28 PM
Subject: 1 Re: The definition of a new attenuator


> Andreas,
>
> Thanks very much for the vote of confidence. I've taken what you
> said and tried to incorporate it into the propossed module. You'll
> find the results here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg
>
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Andreas Lindholm"
> <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> > David Salter asked for a definition of the advanced attenutator in
> the
> > poll. Since it is a vast majority that is pro an attenuator it is
> perhaps
> > time to start diskussion of the features.
> >
> > As I see it this sketch from Kevin is a very good suggestion that
> falls
> > somewhere between what I had in mind as a basic or advanced
> attenutator.
> >
> >
> > > I've put a JPG in the files section
> > >
> ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_1.jpg)
> > > of what I'd be quite happy with.
> >
> > I actually find this proposed module so good that I think it should
> be made
> > as it is. Others have proposed ability to use it for audio purposes
> and that
> > wouldn't be bad. For me audiocapability is one thing that I would
> definitly
> > sort into the advanced version. Further more I think an advanced
> version
> > should have an output limit switch so you can be sure that it never
> boost
> > the signal about say 10 volts and risk blowing other modules with
> it.
> >
> > I like the proposed a133 from Kevin in its setup with one in and
> three out
> > cause it suits me, but I can also see that other options could be
> good so
> > perhaps a good compromise could be to do as with the 180. The buyer
> can
> > choose if he wants it configured as 2-2 or 1-3 for each attenuator.
> >
> > Final word lets say Kevins proposal is the basic dual alternative 2.
> > Everybody that want more features than is proposed please for for
> > alternative 1. As for if it is possible to put in a knob in 4 or 6
> width I
> > am not sure, but it seemed to fit when I glanced at the surface.
> But perhaps
> > the backside needs more space. Perhaps it could be a knob as the
> one used
> > for range selection in the vcos
> >
> > Perhaps in the end we will get a whole range of attenuators. The
> ideal would
> > be a slim single, the proposed dual and an advanced attenuator with
> voltage
> > control, audio capability and max output switch
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , David Salter
> <david.salter@r...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Define advanced.
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > David Salter
> > > > Reuters Consulting
> > > > Tel: +44 20 7542 2402
> > > > Mob: +44 7990562402
> > > > Fax: +44 20 7542 2699
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]
> > > > Sent: 25 March 2003 18:42
> > > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: 1 New poll for Doepfer_a100
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> > > > Doepfer_a100 group:
> > > >
> > > > Would you like Doepfer to make an
> > > > attenutator module
> > > >
> > > > Regarding more detailed layout we will
> > > > conduct a later survey about that.
> > > >
> > > > o Yes, an advanced one
> > > > o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator
> > > > o Yes, but only a simple single
> > > > o Not sure
> > > > o No
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys
> > > id=11076862
> > > >
> > > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo!
> > > > Groups
> > > > web site listed above.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> < http://rd.yahoo.com/M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=17
> > > 05
> > > >
> > >
> 032144:HM/A=1481646/R=0/* http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/cpm/grp/300_f
> > > la
> > > > ke/g22lp Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl>
> > > >
> > > > < http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l
> > > M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egrou
> > > > pmail/S=:HM/A=1481646/rand=219594600>
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > > Service < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
> > > >
> > > > Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for
> > > more
> > > > information and to register, visit
> http://www.reuters.com/messaging
> > > >
> > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> individual
> > > > sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
> be
> > > > the views of Reuters Ltd.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>