Sorry, but the correct link is
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_3.jpg

Regards,
Kevin

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "code_pig" <code_pig@y...> wrote:
> Right. I've done one last image
>
( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg)
> , that incorporates a CV function in the lower channel.
>
> I'm not convinced that using a rotary selector knob (ala the Range
> selector on the VCO's), as it would probably drive the price up.
>
> Also, if the module was made wider and more complex, the
development
> costs woule rise, as would the retail price.
>
> The way I see it, not every module should be all singing and all
> dancing. Sometimes simple "meat and potato" modules, which are
often
> relatively inexpensive to develop and manufacture, fund the
> development of the more exotic modules.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Andreas Lindholm"
> <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> > Not a bad idea. Can you also manage to squeeze in an input for
> voltage
> > controlled attenuation on the lower "channel" on the advanced
> version or
> > perhaps make the advaced module a bit wider and cram in all
> features on
> > both
> >
> > The alterantive to that is to have the advanced version look more
> like the
> > rest of the doepfer range that is a range selector, a attenuate
> level knob,
> > the offset knob and one cv input jack for attenuation and one cv
> inputjack
> > for the offset. And to top that of one input for the input signal
> on the top
> > and two output of the attenuated signal att the bottom and your
> nice LEDs.
> > This of course means that the CVcontrolled-attenuator will be
just
> a single
> > channel attenuator, but a complex one.
> >