--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "John" <jvtalbert@y...> wrote:

> I was certainly one of the ones that voted FOR the
> Mini-Schaltwerk! And if I can't have a mini version, heck I'll

just

> have to save up for the big one! :-D

Hi John, I would reconsider that, unless you want to live in a fixed
16th note world, that said, it allows you to see all of the tracks in
your pattern at once. I just wish you could tied notes with the
bloody thing a la tb303. Come on Chris, there is enough room to make
this feature possible.

>
> True, in one poll where the question was worded along the lines of
> "which modules should be completed next " the Mini-schaltwerk was
> lower in the ranks. However, in the poll where the question was

posed

> separately as to whether Doepfer *should* release a SHALTWERK-LIKE
> trigger sequencer, the response was +80% in favor.

hopefully it will have the ability to tie notes.

>
> Either way, having not had the pleasure to actually use a

Schaltwerk,

> I don't really know if it would operate similar to an SH-101 (a

quick,

> easy to use sequencer recorder).

It would nice if the proposed module could use a midi keyboard to
record notes in real time, nothing fancy and quantized to a 16th or
32nd note.


Certainly, if that is how the

> original Schaltwerk works (only with 8 tracks instead of 1), then I
> would consider it to be a great unit to own at either size! Just

an

> idea.
>
> Kindest regards,
> John
>
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Joe Buechler"

<buechlerjoe@t...>

> wrote:
> > Isn't this the proposed mini-Schaltwerk module It hasn't got

much

> > support in the poll.
> >
> > Joe