hi ingo,
i don't know about this. i only know what's mentioned
in the a101-3 page.
bakis.
--- selfoscillate <
synaptic_music@...
> wrote:
>
> hello bakis,
>
> i know that 10 jacks won't be ommited just for a
> lower price,
> i just wrote that the microprocessor solution would
> be more
> expensive. all least i don't care about the price,
> i'll buy
> this module anyway, but i would prefer the patchable
> version :-)
>
> in my opinion the 12 feedback points would be enough
> for
> esoteric patching and i can't think about a special
> application
> for 12 inputs. two inputs should be fine, as long as
> we have feeback points and outputs for each stage.
>
> another thing, will this phaser incorporate voltage
> control
> of resonance maybe independent vc resonance for
> stages 1-6
> and 7-12 would be a shocking feature for stereo use
> :-)
>
> best wishes
>
> ingo
>
>
>
> --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, Bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> > hi ingo,
> > doepfer aren't omitting the audio inputs for 10 of
> the
> > 12 stages in order to reduce the price of the
> > module,but,because they can't think of any usable
> > application for those 10 extra audio
> inputs.(remember,
> > EACH ONE of the 12 stages WILL have a feedback
> input
> > AND an audio output!only audio inputs for 10
> stages
> > ,except stages 1 and 7 ,are ommited.)if anyone can
> > think of a usable application for those 10 extra
> audio
> > inputs,let doepfer know.
> > bakis.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > hello list,
> > >
> > > i've seen the latest additional ideas on the
> > > provisional
> > > a101-3 page and i would prefer a patchable
> version
> > > without
> > > the microprocessor. it would not only make it
> less
> > > expensive,
> > > it would also make it a more versatile module
> (in my
> > > opinion).
> > >
> > > the 2 separate phaseshift controls and mix
> outputs
> > > are a good
> > > idea, even better than on the moogerfooger
> 12stage
> > > phaser.
> > >
> > > inputs for stages 1 and 7 only would also be ok
> for
> > > me.
> > > as we all know, more inputs are better, but i
> > > wouldn't
> > > mind if it only got these 2 inputs instead of
> 12.
> > > this module will have enough jacks anyway and
> those
> > > feedback
> > > inputs will serve us well enough for sure :-)
> > >
> > > three polarizers are also a very good idea.
> > >
> > > geee, looks like another must-have monster
> module.
> > > awesome awesome awesome
> > >
> > > best wishes
> > >
> > > ingo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
,
> > > "synth_freak_2000"
> > > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > hi list,
> > > > where are all the members a new amazing
> modular
> > > phaser(with
> > > vactrols)
> > > > is on the way with some really unique features
> and
> > > no reaction
> > > any
> > > > comments,or suggestions this will be the best
> > > modular vocoder out
> > > > there!(no other phaser module has all these
> > > capabilities).
> > > > bakis.
> > > >
> > > > [doepfer_a100]group owner
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Bakis Sirros
> > Parallel Worlds / Polariton
> > Athens-Greece
> > 1 group owner
> >
http://www.rubber.gr
> >
http://www.ward12.com
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!
> > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product
> search
> >
http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
>
=====
Bakis Sirros
Parallel Worlds / Polariton
Athens-Greece
1 group owner
http://www.rubber.gr
http://www.ward12.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com