hello list,

in my opinion the a143-2 and a143-3 are the right thing for
those who want to build up a compact system, so my
vote goes to the big version of the a143-1, because it
is the most versatile one. great features.

another thing regarding the a143-3 quad adsr. i know that we
can use separate inverters, but if there is space for additional
sockets, i would love to see inverted outputs too.
anyway it will be a great module even without inverted outputs.
it's just a thought, because i never really understood why the
a141 has no inverted output on board.

best wishes

ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "p. hendricks" <ph@c...> wrote:
> I really like the deluxe model, but it does take up quite a bit
more space.
> Maybe a little could be shaved off by staggering the AD/LFO switch.
Or
> making it only a Tri-AD/LFO with the ins/outs at the bottom
> Or, if it's left the size it is, maybe adding the trig out at the
end of the
> Decay as RM suggested.
>
> The Polarizer and now the comparator, put it in the must have for
me, I love
> tweaking the envelope polarity live. And I have plenty of envelopes
and
> bipolar CV mixer but it's something I always use together so it
makes since
> to have it together.
>
> HOWEVER, given the immense difference, I think it's justified to do
a basic
> version of this AND the deluxe, as the space and price almost
double. And
> for people wanting very compact systems, there should be a market
for the
> basic also. They really both seem targeted at different users.
>
> I really would like to see both, I just can't vote for the basic
one if
> we're missing out on a greater beast.
>
> with all these great modules I hope Dieter is looking for a place
that can
> make larger cases then the G6! as we'll be needing them.
>
> best,
> phil