On 1/27/04 2:07 PM, "shm1400" < shm14@... > wrote:

> I think the end of attack idea is actually much better than my end
> of cycle request. An end of cycle output would also be nice.
> However, the inverting mixer section would add almost as much space
> as a separate inverting mixer. I would prefer to just have them
> side by side. I can understand if outher differ,

well, I understand, and I know we can patch whatever into whatever else. But
to me this +/- mixer is something that should always be there, I can't think
of a time when I wouldn't want to tweak the envelope mix.
But most importantly, to use a separated module.. well...cost, I would guess
it would be $70, because of additional hardware, that's 8 additional jacks,
plus 4 more cables just to patch them together. And space, the extra panel
and extra jacks would take up more room, plus, the extra cables... the
compactedness of the doepfer has pros and cons, and cable clutter is easily
a con, when it makes navigating through cables to find a knob, switch or
jack a chore.

anyway... that's why I'm for it... I do hope end of attack trig out is
added.
best,
phil