i like the idea of a threshold level control, especially
when the "end of attack trigger output" is ommited.
on the other hand, if the module will feature both
trigger outputs, then a fixed threshold for the
"end of decay trigger" would make sense, as it will
make the module smaller and also cheaper. but it also
depends on the maximum decay time possible.
with long decays it could be very cool to be able to
adjust the threshold manually. with short decays this
is not so important.

best wishes

ingo




--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:

> dieter says:
> "The end of attack signal is still available as a two
> pin socket on the board. We will have to wait for the
> first prototype pcbs and front panels to find out if
> we could squeeze the manually wired "end of attack"
> socket between the boards. We are not sure if the
> threshold level control is necessary. Some customers
> think that a fixed threshold would be suficcient (e.g.
> if the output reaches 0.1V in the decay phase). I'm
> not sure if the additional control is a good feature
> or could be omitted."
>
>
>
> ANY OPINIONS
> bakis.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =====
> Bakis Siros
> Parallel Worlds / Polariton
> Athens-Greece
> 1 group owner
> http://www.rubber.gr
> http://www.ward12.com
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/