Yeah, an integrated/normalized VCO-VCF-VCF-EG module could be a real
practical space-saver.
In principle, the A-109 with additional VCO and EG would fit the bill
But my own preference would be for a 12 db filter and a simple ADR EG
(like in ASol's SY01)

Regards
Joost

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "TonyBlack [JohnnyBusca]"
<JohnnyBusca@t...> wrote:

> I also like to see a voice card.
>
> I was able to buy a Doepfer VMS voicecard based on CEM33x0s. Right

now

> it's being fixed, but I'm very happy with it..
>
> (picture of the VMS in the upperleft corner:
> http://www.tonyblack.org/images/allmodular.jpg )
>
> Scanned circuits:
> http://www.synrise.de/user/user_8.htm
>
> Best regards,
> Johnny
>
>
> > Message: 19
> > Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:58:17 -0700
> > From: James Husted <james@e...>
> > Subject: module Ideas...
> >
> > 1) I would love to see a dedicated "voice module", something like

a

> > Oberheim SEM module. It could even be made of current modules just
> > packaged into a single smaller panel. It would have a similar

feature

> > set as a SEM, 2 VCOs (switchable or mixable at the filter wave-

shapes),

> > a simple LFO (maybe with switchable wave-shapes - VC not even

needed),

> > 2 Envelope generators (ADSRs not ASRs like the SEM unless the size
> > restricts it to ASR), a Multimode filter, and a VCA (or a stereo
> > panner/VCA) all with simple inputs and outputs normalized to a

standard

> > mono voice patch. The minimum patching needed would be a single

CV and

> > Gate, but the normalization could be broken to make available

separate

> > CVs for the VCOs and VCF, and gates for the different EGs. The

main

> > thing is to make the feature set is flexible with a emphasis on

small

> > size. There are many times where a "standard" voice architecture

is

> > useful and the ease of patching would be great. The development

time

> > would be minimal since the modules used have all been developed
> > already. It is just a packaging exercise.
> >