Hi Thomas,
I tend to agree mostly with zoran
A-102: resonance range is not optimal; hard to fine-tune
(A.Sol. RS500e is much more to my liking ; but it's price is almost
double)
A-109: nice alround filter, but I generally prefer 12db over 24db
slopes. Really appreciate the built-in mixer & VCA though
A-105; sold it quickly, but regret this a little now
A-124; nice for what it does; excellent price/performance ratio
A-120: sold it almost immediately; no beef
A-121; quite versatile; resonance range quite well laid out
A-107: like it, but have not yet explored it to the max
A.Sol. SY02: nice & dirt but resonance range not enough (supposed to
be adjustable from the trimmers; not tried yet)
I currently also have an eye on the A-108; mixing between the 6 & 24
db outputs seems quite appealing to me
regards
Joost
--- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "Zoran Bosnjak" <dj_allin@h...>
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> this is my favourite subject: filters! And even better: I will not
hide what
> I liked about four filters I owned from Doepfer! So, let's start my
> completely subjective comment.
>
> First: mighty A-108. Description: fat, but not Moog warm. It
reminds me on
> Roland System 100 model 101 filter when making bass sounds (I owned
Model
> 101, and compared it directly to A-108. I even have a bass sample
done with
> both. They sound very close in that sample.) When cutoff is more
open, it
> has even a glimpse of legendary SH-101 - the most sinister filter
ever if
> you ask me (notice I did not use the word "best"). Also, A-108 is
very
> punchy - I started the thread on AH about how to get punchy VCA
(after
> hearing Arp 2600), just to discover that explosiveness on A-108.
This filter
> might take over "filter techno crown" that resides somewhere in
Roland
> family, probably with SH-101 :-)
>
> Second: WASP from Doepfer. You said: cheap sound, and that's
exactly how I
> felt when I returned it. But it would be great for big loop sweeps
in your
> average house club. Dirty energy.
>
> Third: A-102. Pleasant, mild character. Kind of EMS. No bite.
But... Chaos
> starts when self oscillating it, and FM-ing. Unbelievable range of
ringing
> wierdness, not likable all the time. One of those things that I
felt were
> 90% there, but "no cigar", because something is constantly missing
(or
> rather say - too much is there). Just like FM NovaMod I did on my
SH-101 -
> if only I could remove 10% of the sound, it would be pure gold. Big
miss on
> A-102 - lack of resonance control by CV . Why making filter with
wacky
> resonance behaviour, and not being able to control it If A-102 had
that
> input, I would have kept it (instead of CV3 input). I guess it's
not late
> for version 2 - I promise publicly to buy that one.
>
> Fourth: A-109. Sweet! But it's Curtis, so I will not talk too much
about it.
> Pleasant, polite, not too fat. I will probably sell it in the
future, when I
> get...
>
> My next filter buy: Quad Lowpass Gate (I checked samples on
Cynthia's web
> site, and I can only say: where have you been all my life - filter,
of
> course:-)
>
> So, again: this is completely subjective comment! ("One man's
stream is
> another man's poison" - or at least something like that, verse from
Giant
> Sand)
>
> Regards
>
> Zoran
>
> >From: "thomasborax" <thomasborax@y...>
> >Reply-To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: 1 q's
> >Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:19:05 -0000
> >
> >hi folks. my questions in the past have all been answered in a
> >helpful mannner, thank you to all on this list.
> >here's today's queries:
> >
> >the a108 filter. this seems like a good one for me. however, i
> >currently have the Asol sy01 w/ moog ladder 24db lpf. i must say
it
> >is dull, boring and filters too much of the signal out. it's so
dull
> >it almost seems like a volume nob. i had a frostwave ms20 clone,
and
> >(never A/Bed it with an ms20, couldn't tell you if it was in fact
> >ms20-like) i thought that, by contrast, was a very good filter
> >sound. i like greasy, slimy flatulent filters. i have a wasp
> >a124. it's cool, but perhaps has TOO much charactor. a very cheap
> >sound, which is good for me, though not all the time. i've
> >understood that the a108 can be overdriven to make dirty sounds.
> >please comment, for those who have experience with the filter. my
> >first thought is that i don't care for the typical moog lpf, but it
> >seems that this is more versatile and has a great range. i think
> >using the 12 and 6db outputs would be more appropriate to my type
of
> >sound.
> >
> >also a i wonder about the spring reverb unit. is this worth
looking
> >into i've heard some units with very short springs, and they
> >didn't sound so cool. do any of you feel that this has been a good
> >unit for depth, spashy verb and other effects
> >
> >thanks to those who reply-
> >yours((000
> >tom
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Don't just Search. Find!
http://search.sympatico.msn.ca/default.aspx
The new
> MSN Search! Check it out!