Ingo,
I agree. Much as I love my two MAQ's I will purchase the TKB when it becomes available and it makes sense for this unit to be the grown up version of all preceding Doepfer sequencers.
David
David Salter
Senior Project Manager
Reuters Ltd
Tel +44 20 7542 2402
Mob +44 7990562402
email
david.salter@...
RM
david.salter.reuters@...
________________________________
From:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf Of selfoscillate
Sent: 04 October 2005 19:43
To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 1 Re: Doepfer MAQ quantisation question
hello dieter,
from my point of view it makes more sense to incorporate
these "improvements" into the forthcoming sequencer module
(for the tkb) instead of making a new maq16/3.
maybe this forthcoming sequencer can be the successor
of the maq16/3. the features seem to be quite similar.
best wishes
ingo
--- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "Dieter Doepfer"
<hardware@d...> wrote:
> We discussed several times a "MAQ16/3 Mark II". The main reason
why we did
> not develop so far a new sequencer is because we wanted to offer
the
> possibility to upgrade older devices (as for the CV/Gate output
addition
> from version 3.0).
> Most of the suggested improvements would require a hardware change
that does
> not allow to update older devices (e.g. LC display or a second
display for
> more information, additional LEDs to display the step that's value
is
> displayed currently, rotary encoders instead of potentiometers for
exact
> adjustment, and some more).
>
> May be there will come a "MAQ16/3 Mark II" any time but it will
not be
> possible to upgrade the existing MAQ devices because of
hardware/mechanical
> limitations. We believe that the existing hardware of the MAQ16/3
is already
> "exhausted" and it will be a problem to add more features with the
existing
> controls and displays. For example the glowing LEDs to show the
currently
> selected row or the usage of the points of the display are already
such
> makeshifts.
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
]Im Auftrag von analog1k
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Oktober 2005 16:13
> > An:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: 1 Re: Doepfer MAQ quantisation question
> >
> >
> > That's exactly the answer I was looking for, the
> > MAQ just needs refinements IMO. The other problem
> > is when I used to own one, is the sensitivity of
> > the knobs, I mean you just needed to look at or
> > breathe on the panel and things would loose their
> > place, you'd get notes you don't want or it would
> > change by themselves as the sequences were running.
> >
> > I like to see what notes I am dialing in rather than
> > by ear, especially when you're creating polyrhythmic
> > sequences with all three rows.
> >
> > It would be a good idea to implement this on the
> > next new production run of MAQ's.
> >
> > A1k.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "Dieter Doepfer"
<hardware@d...>
> > wrote:
> > > I don't think that this will be possible as the position of
each
> > > potentiometer is measured only when the step in question is
called
> > up. And
> > > there is another problem: there is no LC display but only a 3
digit
> > LED
> > > number display that is able to display only numbers or
characters
> > that can
> > > be realized with the 7 segments ("#" e.g. would be not
possible).
> > >
> > > But it should be possible to display the notes (2.g. "C2")in
the
> > single step
> > > mode by replacing the "#" by another character that can be made
> > with the
> > > segments of the display.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
SPONSORED LINKS
A100 <
http://groups.yahoo.com/gads t=ms&k=A100&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=7qk4KfDanDiWmDiNwkErZA
> Modular system <
http://groups.yahoo.com/gads t=ms&k=Modular+system&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=hHqbBveG60BFBUgxUgOrwQ
> Synthesizer <
http://groups.yahoo.com/gads t=ms&k=Synthesizer&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=TkVI4dZwQYtej5a8axJk6A
>
Electronic payment <
http://groups.yahoo.com/gads t=ms&k=Electronic+payment&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=A8SEMukXwntRihU64CJcYw
> Electronic test equipment <
http://groups.yahoo.com/gads t=ms&k=Electronic+test+equipment&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=PL6Pwu2HodmGUNuOO8bogQ
> Guitar synthesizer <
http://groups.yahoo.com/gads t=ms&k=Guitar+synthesizer&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=3frDmfcEV4WWrJJ1dkws0w
>
________________________________
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "Doepfer_a100 <
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100
> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:
Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
subject=Unsubscribe>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> .
________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at
http://www.reuters.com
To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit
http://www.reuters.com/productinfo
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]