previous | index | next |
<< | topic list | >> |
>http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/rs500e-nores.mp3
> hello ernst,
>
> here are some small examples for comparing
> the a102 and rs500e.
> the recording level was identical on all
> examples to show the different output
> characteristics of both filters.
> also on all examples the cutoff was
> modulated by the same triangle lfo.
> the rs500e was switched to "24db" and
> "fast cv" response.
>
>
> 1,
> first you hear a sawtooth wave (a110) at the
> filter input. no resonance.
>
>
> - 220 kbhttp://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/rs500e-res-only.mp3
> http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/a102-nores.mp3
> - 221 kb
>
>
> 2.
> now only the filter at full resonance, no audio
> input.
> the resonance sounds really different.
>
>
> - 198 kbhttp://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/a102-res-only.mp3
>
> - 195 kbhttp://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/rs500e-spot.mp3
>
>
> 3.
> finally a recording with the same sawtooth vco as in
> the
> first example. the audio input knob was fully cw and
> the resonance was set around the point where the
> filter
> starts to oscillate.
>
>
> - 387 kbBakis Sirros
> http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/a102-spot.mp3
> - 388 kb
>
>
> as you can hear, the filters are far from sounding
> identical.
>
>
> best wishes
>
> ingo
>
>
>
>
>
>