The soundfiles are simply great! Looking very much forward to the
module! Regards, Ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Dieter Doepfer"
<hardware@d...> wrote:

>
> The first Karplus/Strong examples have been added to the

preliminary page of

> the BBD module (www.doepfer.de/A100_BBD.htm).
> I'm still waiting for the answer of the BBD manufacturer if even

1024 stage

> BBD's are available. If it is available we may put both BBDs on

the module

> (2 outputs available that can be used to mix together with the

original

> signal and two different feedback pathes, both with

positive/negative

> control). Thank's Ingo for this idea - even if the module will

become a bit

> more expensive (~ Euro 150 instead of ~ 100, only a rough

estimate !).

>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]Im Auftrag von Florian

Anwander

> > Gesendet: Montag, 17. Oktober 2005 16:26
> > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: Re: AW: 1 Re: BBD module first mp3 sound

clips!!!

> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Dieter Doepfer wrote:
> > > So the HCVSO goes up to 200kHz, resulting in 100kHz BBD clock

and

> > > consequently 10.24ms delay time.
> > ok, so we should do a little survey here: To my opinion 10ms as

minimum

> > delay I would say, there is no real "flanging" effect possible.

Flanging

> > is a modulation of center delaytimes between 1ms and 8-10 ms.

Everything

> > with delaytimes larger than 10ms I would call "chorus". Still a

nice

> > effect, but it will lack those 'narrow' and 'claustrophobic'

aspect of a

> > good flanger or very short delays.
> >
> > > suggestion and put a so-so 1V/Oct HSVCO into the BBD module

but offer an

> > > external clock input (normalled to the internal HSVCO) that
> > enables to drive
> > > the unit from an external precision HSVCO (I hope we will be
> > able to design
> > > a better - but even more expensive - HSVCO in the near future).
> > This sounds very reasonable.
> >
> > > My comment to Karplus/Strong and similar:
> > > For these applications I'd prefer the announced universal
> > AD/processor/DA
> > > module.
> > I agree with this tooo.
> >
> > > At the moment we prefer
> > > the adjustment of the memory length with up/down buttons (e.g.
> > > 2/4/8/16/32/64/128 ..... 1M) and a 3-digit LED display (the
> > decimal points
> > > could indicate "kilo" and "mega").
> > Giving devils advocat: What about a CV-controllable division

factor

> >
> >
> > > b.t.w. The SC filter prototype working as well. To speak the
> > truth: it's not
> > > very exciting from my point of view. Just a chaste, clean
> > filter having not
> > > very much character to my estimation. Maybe I use to often the

A-106-1,

> > > A-107 and A-124 ...
> > Thats what the SC-Filter sounds like. It is only really

interesting

> > because of the steep cutoff slope (and also because it can simply
> > connected to any kind of sampling rate). How steep will the

slope of the

> > SC-Filter-module be
> >
> > Florian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>