hello ingo,

if you still have questions regarding the a136,
please contact me directly off-list.

best wishes

ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "ilanode" <techmeier@w...> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Tom and Ingo! I'm still confused. Ingo, the impact on a
sine
> was close to non-existent. None of the waveforms were able to come
> up with a result worth mentioning. We were 2 of us in front of the
> module and both *very* disappointed untill we came up with the
> Jomox. Since the A pot needed to be at -1 in order not to amplify
> probably it's a calibration issue with this particular unit we were
> toying with Regards, Ingo
>
>
> - In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "selfoscillate"
> <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > hello ingo,
> >
> > 1. the a136 should have great effect on waveforms like
> > triangle, sine or sawtooth, but the results vary widely,
> > depending on the knob settings. on some settings you get
> > no output at all.
> >
> > 2. i use the a136 for complex signals too, like drums
> > or vco-mixtures. often the level is boosted, maybe that
> > is why the bass is boosted too.
> >
> > 3. indeed it is not easy to get a neutral setting.
> > your described knob-settings don't give neutral settings
> > for sure. i'll try to figure out the neutral setting
> > if i find the time.
> >
> > 4. afaik the pots are no attenuators, the pot setting and the
> > cv are added internally. i guess the a136 manual will
> > help clearing this issue.
> > i often use the a136 for complex external
> > signals. it is also nice inside a feedback loop.
> > dc-voltages will also be altered heavily, but i don't
> > do that too often, the changes are not subtle enough for me.
> >
> > best wishes
> >
> > ingo
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "ilanode" <techmeier@w...>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello list, the A136 is on my mind for long time. Recently I
had
> the
> > > chance to toy with it for a while and was wondering on the
> results:
> > > 1) On *any* of the VCO's waveforms it had rather minor impact.
> > > 2)Dramtic and great results could be obtained by feeding a more
> > > complex signal (= Jomox drum machine) into the module. However,
> some
> > > settings boost the bass which I didn't expect.
> > > 3) There was no neutral setting. Eg feeding white noise into
the
> > > module while all pots set to 0 lead to an obvious loss of high
> freq.
> > > 4) I expected the -L pot being an attentuator for external CV
> on -A
> > > (some for L and A) but they seem to be independent from one
> another.
> > > I've to admit that I have no experience with Distortion devices
> (let
> > > alone Waveshaper) so probably my expectations were mislead.
> Anyhow, I
> > > wonder wether all A136 behave as decribed: almost no effect
even
> on a
> > > square wave; possible bass boost; lack of neutral setting; no
> > > connection btn. -L/-A and L/A And, your application for the
> A136
> > > TIA, Ingo
> > >
> >
>