What is your objective
You aren't going to be able to measure a messed up cap unless you have some serious equipment like a very high bandwidth 4 channel DSO scope with 16 channels of logic and huge memory. Perhaps if you took the cap out of the circuit and did some sort of pulse tests to it you could find some irregularities with cheaper equipment, but why waste your time
The caps are failing. I can tell you that because replacing them has fixed the same problem for me in the past. I don't need to troubleshoot a cap on the molecular level to know that it is messed up. Caps do all sorts of strange and unexplainable stuff when they are beyond their lifespan that you won't learn in school.
You have classic faulty cap symptoms:
1.) The Synth tunes sometimes which mostly rules out CMOS with the exception of wiggling (see below).
2.) You probably just took it out of storage or woke it up from a very large period of dormancy. If it starts acting up after a few weeks to a month, the caps are bad; they are trying to reform or have dried out.
If it isn't the caps it is probably CMOS, a trimmer with a partially lifted wiper, a bad jumper, or a bad solder joint on the jumper socket that has been cracked from removal stress.
Even if you find some silver bullet problem unrelated to the caps, the synth will actually work better if you replace the caps. Your leds will run brighter, patches will load faster and it will tune faster.
I forgot to tell you in the previous post that you should always reset the chips in their sockets before troubleshooting; this clears up lots and lots of problems because Oberheim used crappy sockets that patially "wiggle" the chips out of them when the board flexes from movement.
Good luck.
-Mike
--- In
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
, "Ricard" <ricard2010@...> wrote:
>
>
> Well, there definitely is a bug in the software, no doubt about that, but that's not saying that there's something else wrong in the synth which causes this bug to be exposed, e.g. the oscillators should tune tightly enough that the bug is never exposed, which probably explains why Oberheim themselves appearently never noticed it. (The fact that they didn't points to sloppy engineering but that's another issue).
>
> Many posts refer to replacing the electrolytic capacitors on the voice boards, which I might very well do, however, no one has really explained why they would cause pitch instability. There are 7 caps on each voice board, 5 of which are in the signal chain, and 2 of are used for power supply decoupling. The latter two can affect pitch stability to some extent I suppose, but the other five
They might affect other things, such as the frequency response or other effect, but I can't see how they can affect the tuning.
>
> I agree that components can and will age, but as a result of that there will be some parameter (capacitance, leakage current or whatever) that will degenerate and which can be measured and diagnosed. Agreed, if the leakage current goes up, power drain will increase, putting a larger load on the regulators which can cause premature failure or instability due to thermal issues etc.
>
> That said, there is another problem in this particular machine, on all voices there are a couple of control voltage values which cause the 12 dB to generate a lot noise at its output. Could very well be a bad cap in the middle somewhere causing that phenomenon.
>
> The very act of removing the voice boards, even potentially cleaning the contacts, and then replacing them I would think would tend to have a larger effect on stability.
>
> Yeah, the power supply rectifiers are underdimensioned. Someone has already had a go at these in this particular machine though.
>
> Well, I'll see. Perhaps I'll have a go at recapping one voice board, taking the others out, and see if it actually helps.
>
> /Ricard
>
> --- In
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
, "Mike" <mborish_2000@> wrote:
> >
> > Your caps are bad. If you don't replace them, eventually the synth will die. If you don't replace the caps, some CMOS will go out, you'll experience all sorts of erratic behavior, then the Bridge Rectifier or regulators will go. Oberheim's are famous for not tuning if the caps go bad.
> >
> > Replace the caps. The bridge rectifiers in the original design are simply too small and also need to be replaced. Replacing the regulators won't hurt either; the synth will run cooler.
> >
> > An extreme mod has been made on my OB-8, probably has close to the same software, in the autotune loop by removing the caps that DC block the VCF from the VCA and I pass autotune every time because the synth has been restored properly.
> >
> > There isn't a bug in the software.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> >
> > --- In
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
, "Ricard" <ricard2010@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Here I go replying to myself, I haven't had any responses here on the forum, but one member responded privately (you know who you are, thanks!, and it's been a real nice chat afterwards too).
> > >
> > > What I'd like to ask is to one extent other people also have problems with the autotune.
> > >
> > > In searching for the problem with the autotune, I've analyzed not only
> > > the hardware but also the software program that runs on the Z80 processor.
> > >
> > > It turns out to be a fact that the autotune acceptance range is -24 .. 0 cents. First off, the range is rather large, and secondly it is offset in a strange way.The algorithm works like this:
> > >
> > > For each oscillator, the synth tries to calibrate the oscillator 50 times. For each time it measures the period of a pulse formed from four cycles of a target tone C4 (1046.502 Hz) tone. The resulting period, measured as 1/4.9152 MHz cycles, should be 4964 (hex). If the period is within +1/-0 of 4964 (hex), then it goes on to the next oscillator. Otherwise, if the last measurement cycle was
> > > within +256 / -0 from 4964 (hex), the oscillator is considered ok, otherwise it is considered failed, which will cause the corresponding LED to flash after the tune procedure is complete. 256 steps (or FF hex) steps from 4964 works out as 24 cents at the measurement frequency.
> > >
> > > I've verified that this is in fact the case by breaking up the autotune circuit and injecting a tone from another (digital) synth where I can set the frequency fairly exactly, and also verify the pitch using a tuner.
> > >
> > > So that's the reason for several oscillators failing on my machine; probably the general instability in the synth causes the oscillators not to be spot on, andif they're not, the oscillators are considered untuned if they are even half a hertz over the reference frequency, but not if they are up to 24 cents below.
> > >
> > > I believe this is a bug in the software, notwithstanding any instability in the machine due to aging components etc.
> > >
> > > All this is rather technical I know, so perhaps not really the right forum. Someone might find it useful I hope. My main reason for this post was to try and poll to what extent others also experience autotune problems, both on unrestored and restored machines.
> > >
> > > /Ricard
> > >
> >
>