| previous | index | next |
| << | topic list | >> |
We’re into rarified air here, so I’m sure there will be plenty of differing opinion, BUT
I don’t think whatever sonic difference that may allege to exist could be illustrated by a simple mp3.
I’ve owned both and can hear no diff (aside that which could be explained to manufacturing tolerance). Listening closely ENOUGH and you’ll hear differences between every unit of any kind.
Hey, it’s *analog* -- it’s supposed to be a little bit organic :-)
From:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oberheim@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of
Paul Cunningham
Sent:
Friday, April 16, 2010 9:19 AM
To:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Re: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...
I have had the Matrix-6 and really cannot confirm such a dramatic difference. I *can* tell you that the build quality of the Matrix-6 was less than impressive. Don't know if the 6r was manufactured overseas.
Seriously, can some one post a mp3 that illustrates these differences I'd like to hear what the big deal is all about because apparently I missed it before my Matrix-6 started to fail. -pc
On Apr 15, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Jumper wrote:
more analog sound than that of the matrix 1000, they are supposed to be the same, but those wide bodied CEMS and the sightly odd way its clock pulse behaves compared to that of the 1000 makes them worlds appart imo