| previous | index | next |
| << | topic list | >> |
Except for any of the ones I’ve ever owned.
Channelize.
Split.
Layer.
Transpose.
Any of that is pretty well covered.
Even/Odd Not that I can find.
From:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oberheim@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of
Fraser Hutchinson
Sent:
Friday, April 16, 2010 12:07 PM
To:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
RE: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...
You could do that with almost any midi event processor, I believe.
From:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oberheim@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of
LarryS
Sent:
Friday, April 16, 2010 11:37 AM
To:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
RE: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...
Stereo is cool, yes.
But the only thing I *wish* I could come up with is an even/odd note assignment.
Yamaha did this on the TX802 (and maybe a couple other modules). You could assign the module to respond to all the even number notes or odd numbered notes. This is a fabulous function.
Unless you play in a lot of diminished or whole tone scales, anyway ;-)
It interleaves the notes very nicely. It’s the ONLY reason I keep a couple of Yam modules around and I so wish I could do it with the Oberheims.
Kurzweil does this, too, by any divisor by assigning multiple modules (1of3, 2of3, 3of3, for instance).
Number tricks.
Anyway, the effect is incredible in my books. Like to do it with my M1000s.
L.
From:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oberheim@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of
Paul Cunningham
Sent:
Friday, April 16, 2010 11:19 AM
To:
oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Re: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...
Yeah... I mean I've got 3 Matrix-1000s now and there is a subtle difference between the sound of each of them! That's part of the reason they sound so good in stereo! -pc