Hi there sfrules,

I admit that I used the a-word in my quantizer-idea, but only to make
it clear that the output of a quantizer doesn't have to be limited to
scales, but that even *arpeggio-like* patterns should be possivble,
and even patterns spanning more than one octave.

Florian and Joosts postings about an arpeggio-generator are quite a
different cup of tea, because a *classic* arpeggio is derived from a
chord (a few different voltages/midi values at the same time) and a
... well .. *pseudo-arpeggio* ( ) from a quantizer would be derived
from one single (monophonic ) dynamic voltage. That's quite
different. Personally I like both ideas.

Anton

On 21 May 2006, at 10:30, sfrules wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I am getting major confused.
> There is much talk of a quantizer
> and much talk of an arpeggiator.
>
> I can roughly follow each, but
> when you speak of putting them in
> the same module my cerebral cortex
> shorts out!!!
>
> Is it possible that an arpeggiator
> would make a better stand-alone module
> Cheeper, too
>
> sfrules
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>