Gosh bakis, now you've gone and made me wish I could take some words
back.

I've been poking around some of the other synth groups recently, and
by comparison it's very noticeable how well you've done personally in
making the A100 group so successful. My hat's off to you.

Joe

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> hi joe and all the others,
> please,feel free to speak about anything that has to
> do with the a100 and that includes the shaltwerk
> and,possibly the regelwerk...despite what dieter
> doepfer thinks,i beleive that the shaltwerk
> and,possibly,regelwerk can be extensions of the a100
> modular,so,i don't mind...i would never want to be
> considered as a"friend of the company" in a bad way.i
> mean ,i am a friend of dieter doepfer(i hope he thinks
> the same for me...), but that doesn't mean that i
> don't want the members of the group to talk about any
> a100 related problems...and,of course,feel free to
> tell us any complaints...THIS GROUP IS NOT FOR
> MARKETING NEW A100 MODULES!I MEAN THAT!so,...MAKE GOOD
> USE OF IT! :-)
> BAKIS.
>
> --- buechlerjoe <buechlerjoe@t...> wrote:
> > My last post on the subject, ending on a positive
> > note so bakis
> > doesn't blow a gasket:
> >
> > I don't disagree with anything that's been said, but
> > the fact of
> > the matter is that I use my Regelwerk constantly, to
> > the extent
> > that I'd be hard pressed to get by without it. I
> > consider it to be
> > an integral part of my A100 system, just like my
> > outboard effects.
> > The step sequencer complements the A155 - if one of
> > them won't do the
> > job, usually the other will.
> >
> > Here's some examples of where it's valuable:
> >
> > -There was a discussion earlier about how to create
> > a manual gate.
> > Answer: RW momentary pushbutton.
> >
> > -Florian was discussing a DIY module to switch in
> > insert effects in a
> > live performance. I patch the RW to an A150 for this
> > kind of stuff.
> >
> > -Bakis wants a CV/Gate to midi converter so he can
> > trigger other midi
> > synths from the A155. I trigger other midi synths
> > from the RW.
> >
> > What makes it so frustrating, though, is that the
> > Regelwerk damn well
> > had the potential to be, like, the coolest piece of
> > music gear in the
> > universe. Too bad it didn't work out that way.
> >
> > Joe
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45"
> > <ringmod45@y...> wrote:
> > > no kidding, hence all my bitching and complaining
> > about the
> > ...werks.
> > > the boxes look great from the outside but they are
> > so under powered,
> > > it makes sick to see them this way. personally,i
> > think the regelwerk
> > > was put together to make use of all the the
> > circuit boards that were
> > > laying around the shop. they already knew the cpu
> > and memory were
> > > tapped on the schaltwerk, so why they built the
> > regelwerk with the
> > > same the processor and memory scheme, i don't
> > know. in the design
> > and
> > > function process doepfer should of realised the
> > regelwerk was gonna
> > > be limited from the get go.
> > >
> > > why they chose to release it this way is
> > dumbfounding because now
> > > they are supposedly planning a cpu and memory
> > board upgrade for both
> > > boxes. if they would have invested the proper time
> > and resources
> > into
> > > the developement of the regelwerk with a new cpu
> > and memory, doepfer
> > > could have avoided the whole mess regarding these
> > boxes. the
> > > schaltwerk would have been ready at the same time
> > as the regelwerk
> > > was released. they would not have to play catch up
> > and go through
> > the
> > > ringer for releasing them so underpowered. not to
> > mention the bad
> > and
> > > negative image they garnered for releasing them
> > this way and the 5
> > > years of an upgrade is coming and totally ignoring
> > the requests from
> > > their paid customers who haved bought them.
> > >
> > > will doepfer ever admit they screwed up, i don't
> > think so coming
> > from
> > > their " all the boxes work as described in the
> > manual" stance. i
> > > think they should bite a big chunk of the bullet
> > when it comes to
> > > developement of the upgrade. the customers who
> > have piad for the
> > > regelwerk basically helped doepfer recoup some of
> > their costs from
> > > the schaltwerk fiasco. because of this both boxes
> > are in a sorry
> > > state. hold on we need a new filter last week to
> > come up with new
> > > sounds, but let's leave the controllers the way
> > they are, who cares
> > > about having only 16th notes lengths. please put
> > some thought into
> > > this mess and clean it up.
> > >
> > > i am sorry for the bandwidth but this subject
> > brings up the " i feel
> > > i have been jooked " feeling everytime the S and R
> > words come up.
> > >
> > > patiently waiting for an upgrade so i can use them
> > properly,
> > > RM
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Andreas Lindholm"
> > > <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> > > > Reading this last post from buchlerjoe I wonder
> > why on earth did
> > the
> > > > regelwerk got released at all It is now
> > incomrehensible with all
> > > the
> > > > features that is obviously only nearly finished
> > or crippled. It
> > > could have
> > > > been so awesome with what seem so little more
> > effort and a bit
> > more
> > > time...
> > > > I am glad the A100 isn't... if it was
> > regelworkmanship on it the
> > > VCO would
> > > > only have one vc input and it would be disabled
> > if you choose
> > > choose SAW or
> > > > something. and of course some of the knobs would
> > have been
> > removed.
> > > Arrgh!
> > > > Better not ask anything more about this, I just
> > don't want to hear
> > > about
> > > > more...
> > > >
> > > > None the less thanx Joe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "buechlerjoe" <buechlerjoe@t...>
> > > > To: <Doepfer_a100@y...>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 11:08 PM
> > > > Subject: 1 Re: Schaltwerk requested
> > functions mockup
> > > webpage
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Some of the functions which have no UI but run
> > on the Regelwerk,
> > > like
> > > > > midi controller data from the sequencer, can
> > be programmed via
> > > the PC
> > > > > software (if I understand correctly, I haven't
> > tried this
> > myself.
> > > If
> > > > > I'm going to turn the computer on, I'm going
> > to run Cakewalk,
> > not
> > > some
> > > > > Rube Goldberg deal where I program the
> > Regelwerk sequencer from
> > > the
> > > > > PC.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Others functions such as the track modes
> > (forward, reverse,
> > > pendulum)
> > > > > have no UI or PC editing, but will still run
> > on the Regelwerk.
> > The
> > > > > only way to use them is to either bulk
> > transfer the sequence
> > from
> > > a
> > > > > Shaltwerk, or use one of the preset patterns
> > as a template -
> > > several
> > > > > of the Regelwerk's preset patterns can't be
> > created on the
> > > Regelwerk.
> > > > > Chris Asall described this on the Doepfer
> > forum.
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe
> > > > >
> > > > > download the--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Andreas
> > Lindholm"
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> 1 group owner-moderator
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!
> Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
> http://health.yahoo.com