>i beleive that the shaltwerk and,possibly,regelwerk can be extensions of the a100 modular,<
Well, if you patch your favorite guitar effect pedal (or an external filter bank or whatever) into the signal flow of the A-100 then you extend the modular as well. But do you have to discuss it in here I don´t think so!
Folks, I think there´s a Schaltwerk group on Yahoo (or was it Regelwerk... sorry, I´m not interested in this machines). If you want to discuss them AND the A-100, then please join both groups and keep the topics separated.
Did anyone think about rewriting the A-190´s software when talking about software updates I´d really really like to see the arpeggiator implemented in A-190´s performance-mode #5 one day. But instead you´re making your brains smoke when it comes to the *****werks´ OS update or even redesign. A little bit off-topic in my opinion.
Does anyone know the AHOT (Analog Heaven Off-Topic) - list What about running a similar list in parallel to the A-100 list Everyone who wants to join may join. I won´t.
THIS GROUP IS FOR DISCUSSING THE A-100 SYSTEM... MAKE GOOD USE OF IT! (Bakis, sorry for the sarcasm :-)
all the best
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: bakis Sirros
To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: 1 Re: Gosh it is halfe baked!
hi joe and all the others,
please,feel free to speak about anything that has to
do with the a100 and that includes the shaltwerk
and,possibly the regelwerk...despite what dieter
doepfer thinks,i beleive that the shaltwerk
and,possibly,regelwerk can be extensions of the a100
modular,so,i don't mind...i would never want to be
considered as a"friend of the company" in a bad way.i
mean ,i am a friend of dieter doepfer(i hope he thinks
the same for me...), but that doesn't mean that i
don't want the members of the group to talk about any
a100 related problems...and,of course,feel free to
tell us any complaints...THIS GROUP IS NOT FOR
MARKETING NEW A100 MODULES!I MEAN THAT!so,...MAKE GOOD
USE OF IT! :-)
BAKIS.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]