Thanks for that Chris.I know of some very good systems myself too.
Try SPEAR: http://www.klingbeil.com/spear/
But the aim of my message was to find out why these people are on one hand
hammering on a true scientificly perfect sine wave generator and then on the
other hand ignore the scientific part of additive synthesis.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Chris Muir < cbm@... > wrote:

>
> On Dec 1, 2008, at 10:03 AM, achtung_999 wrote:
>
> > I think it is rather extremely naïve that you think you can model
> > natural
> > sounds with additive synthesis.History has proven that many people
> > thought
> > it was possible but failed in the end.
>
> There have a number of pretty good additive synthesis and resynthesis
> projects. Several systems, albeit digital, allowed phases to roll
> freely. There have price barriers in commercializing these, though.
>
> There are certainly challenges in implementing an additive system with
> analog electronics, but keeping phase relationships might not be as
> important as you think, though.
>
> - C
>
> Chris Muir
> cbm@... <cbm%40well.com>
> http://www.xfade.com
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]