Hi Martin,
just notice that you still have only one VCO in your system. Your
question on the LFO makes me wonder wether you think you can sort
mimick several VCOs with multiples and dividers as well. That won't
work in all respects since it's important for several techniques to
have 2 VCOs each one with it's own cycle. You'll loose a lot with
just one VCO.
Regards, Ingo
--- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "martin_rudling"
<martinrudling@h...> wrote:
> Hi. If you´ve been logged off for a while and happen to see this
> message, please don´t pass it by just because it´s some weeks old,
> every comment that I received so far has led to important
adjustments
> in my sys-planning!
>
> Right now I would be very happy for some advice regarding the
choice
> of filters!
>
> For example, anyone could say something about choosing A108-filter
or
> A121 Multimode fltr Also very uncertain about choosing A124-
Wasp
> filter or A106-1Extreme filter.( )
>
> Thank you very much Ingo for yr help. I removed one of the a134 VC-
> panning and added an a175 inverter as you suggested. One thing
that I
> did NOT do, as you will see, is to add another LFO. This is
because
> of my intentions of using ONE "master tempo" generated from a
single
> lfo, and then reproduce (using multiples) different versions of it
> with the clock dividers, (please tell me if this isn´t
realistic!).
> Then I aim to "mix" these different versions to generate a sum -
> internally synced - lfo, then send this to VCA, VC-panning and
VCF.
> For this I would obviously have a lot help from the future
> model "a143-4" which still is at development stage. (no release
date
> planned so far, D Doepfer replied this morning; after I had
expressed
> my wishes to him in an e-mail yesterday...)
>
> Anyway. My own logic tells me I can do these things in other ways,
> and if someone has the opposite experience, please shout out to me
> very loud!!!
>
> I didn´t completely understand yr solutions that should make the
> second (now removed) a134 unnecessary, but of course I´m willing
to
> believe you... Well, my intention with it was to use one of them
as
> a regular panning mod, and the other to experiment with, for
> instance, shifting between to filters...
>
> Ok. Here comes the, since yesterday, updated list:
>
>
>
>
>
> >A110 Oscillator10TE
> >
> >
> >
> >A106-1 Extreme filter/// A106-1 Extreme Filter/// A108 LP/BP
filter
> >
> >A121 Multimode filter/// A107 Morphing Filter/// A107 Morhing
filter
> >
> >A124 Wasp filter/// (A124 Wasp fltr)/// (A 106-1 Extreme fltr)
> >
> >
> >
> >A131 VCA 8TE
> >
> >A131 VCA 8TE
> >
> >A132 Dual VCA
> >
> >A132 Dual VCA
> >
> >A134 VC Panning 8TE
> >
> >A136 Distortion Waveshaper 8TE
> >
> >A135 VC mixer
>
> A138A Mixer 8TE (linear)
> >
> >A138c polarizing mixer (could this module replace the one above
or
> do you think I will find use for both )
> >
> >A145 LFO 8TE
> >
> >A143-2 Quad ADSR
> >
> >A160 Clock divider
> >
> >A161 Clock sequencer
> >
> >A163 VC clock divider
>
> A175 dual voltage inverter
> >
> >A180 Multiple 4TE
> >
> >A180 Multiple 4TE
> >
> >A190 Midi-CV10TE
> >
> > 1xBlind plate 2TE
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@y...>
> >Reply-To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: 1 Re: new memb, planning issues
> >Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 07:23:12 -0000
> >
> >
> >hello martin,
> >
> >i'd throw in another vco and another lfo.
> >or exchange the a145 lfo with an a143/3 quad lfo,
> >if you don't need the sine out and retrigger input
> >of the a145.
> >
> >two a134 and an a135 seems to be quite unusual
> >for a starter system.
> >
> >another module which i use a lot is the a175 inverter,
> >especially because the a143/2 has no inverted outs.
> >this will maybe make the second a134 obsolete, because
> >you can reproduce a lot of the functionality of the a134
> >with the a135 or an a132 then.
> >
> >please also note that the a134 can only process audio signals
> >just like the a135. cv-processing is not possible with
> >a134 and a135.
> >
> >best wishes
> >
> >ingo