that leads me to idea. let's have a 'one vco only'(maybe + mixer)
 patch contest. anybody since the underwater monster sinked.
 cheers to all
 t
 --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "ilanode" <techmeier@w...>
 wrote:
 > Hi Martin,
 > just notice that you still have only one VCO in your system. Your
 > question on the LFO makes me wonder wether you think you can sort
 > mimick several VCOs with multiples and dividers as well. That
won't
 > work in all respects since it's important for several techniques
to
 > have 2 VCOs each one with it's own cycle. You'll loose a lot with
 > just one VCO.
 > Regards, Ingo
 >
 > --- In
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
, "martin_rudling"
 > <martinrudling@h...> wrote:
 > > Hi. If you´ve been logged off for a while and happen to see this
 > > message, please don´t pass it by just because it´s some weeks
old,
 > > every comment that I received so far has led to important
 > adjustments
 > > in my sys-planning!
 > >
 > > Right now I would be very happy for some advice regarding the
 > choice
 > > of filters!
 > >
 > > For example, anyone could say something about choosing A108-
filter
 > or
 > > A121 Multimode fltr Also very uncertain about choosing A124-
 > Wasp
 > > filter or A106-1Extreme filter.( )
 > >
 > > Thank you very much Ingo for yr help. I removed one of the a134
VC-
 > > panning and added an a175 inverter as you suggested. One thing
 > that I
 > > did NOT do, as you will see, is to add another LFO. This is
 > because
 > > of my intentions of using ONE "master tempo" generated from a
 > single
 > > lfo, and then reproduce (using multiples) different versions of
it
 > > with the clock dividers, (please tell me if this isn´t
 > realistic!).
 > > Then I aim to "mix" these different versions to generate a sum -
 > > internally synced - lfo, then send this to VCA, VC-panning and
 > VCF.
 > > For this I would obviously have a lot help from the future
 > > model "a143-4" which still is at development stage. (no release
 > date
 > > planned so far, D Doepfer replied this morning; after I had
 > expressed
 > > my wishes to him in an e-mail yesterday...)
 > >
 > > Anyway. My own logic tells me I can do these things in other
ways,
 > > and if someone has the opposite experience, please shout out to
me
 > > very loud!!!
 > >
 > > I didn´t completely understand yr solutions that should make the
 > > second (now removed) a134 unnecessary, but of course I´m willing
 > to
 > > believe you... Well, my intention with it was to use one of
them
 > as
 > > a regular panning mod, and the other to experiment with, for
 > > instance, shifting between to filters...
 > >
 > > Ok. Here comes the, since yesterday, updated list:
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > > >A110 Oscillator10TE
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >A106-1 Extreme filter/// A106-1 Extreme Filter/// A108 LP/BP
 > filter
 > > >
 > > >A121 Multimode filter/// A107 Morphing Filter/// A107 Morhing
 > filter
 > > >
 > > >A124 Wasp filter/// (A124 Wasp fltr)/// (A 106-1 Extreme fltr)
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >A131 VCA 8TE
 > > >
 > > >A131 VCA 8TE
 > > >
 > > >A132 Dual VCA
 > > >
 > > >A132 Dual VCA
 > > >
 > > >A134 VC Panning 8TE
 > > >
 > > >A136 Distortion Waveshaper 8TE
 > > >
 > > >A135 VC mixer
 > >
 > > A138A Mixer 8TE (linear)
 > > >
 > > >A138c polarizing mixer (could this module replace the one
above
 > or
 > > do you think I will find use for both )
 > > >
 > > >A145 LFO 8TE
 > > >
 > > >A143-2 Quad ADSR
 > > >
 > > >A160 Clock divider
 > > >
 > > >A161 Clock sequencer
 > > >
 > > >A163 VC clock divider
 > >
 > > A175 dual voltage inverter
 > > >
 > > >A180 Multiple 4TE
 > > >
 > > >A180 Multiple 4TE
 > > >
 > > >A190 Midi-CV10TE
 > > >
 > > > 1xBlind plate 2TE
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > > >From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@y...>
 > > >Reply-To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
 > > >To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
 > > >Subject: 1 Re: new memb, planning issues
 > > >Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 07:23:12 -0000
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >hello martin,
 > > >
 > > >i'd throw in another vco and another lfo.
 > > >or exchange the a145 lfo with an a143/3 quad lfo,
 > > >if you don't need the sine out and retrigger input
 > > >of the a145.
 > > >
 > > >two a134 and an a135 seems to be quite unusual
 > > >for a starter system.
 > > >
 > > >another module which i use a lot is the a175 inverter,
 > > >especially because the a143/2 has no inverted outs.
 > > >this will maybe make the second a134 obsolete, because
 > > >you can reproduce a lot of the functionality of the a134
 > > >with the a135 or an a132 then.
 > > >
 > > >please also note that the a134 can only process audio signals
 > > >just like the a135. cv-processing is not possible with
 > > >a134 and a135.
 > > >
 > > >best wishes
 > > >
 > > >ingo