Hi Florian,

If this BBD-manufacterer goes along I think Ingo's idea is good from
a flexibility point of view, it would even be nicer if it were possible to
have a sort of freqency-divider option for rhythmic variation, but lets
face it: we're all gonna have to buy at least 2 bbd modules, whatever
the end result may be... :-)

Anton

On 19 Oct 2005, at 11:52, Florian Anwander wrote:

> Hi Bakis
>
> Hmm, sorry; perhaps now I spoil ingo's suggestion, but I think it would
> be a waste of ressource.
> If I have two BBDs, I want to modulate their clock from different
> modulation sources in 80 percent of all cases. Lets take as example the
> famous Roland chorus, which is two BBDs whereone is modulated direct by
> the LFO the other by the inverted LFO signal.
>
> Either I'd like to have two separate modules or at least one module with
> two separate delaylines. There are a lot of famous BBD-based devices
> like the Dynacord TAM-21, the A/DA or the Roland Dimension-D. At the
> moment these examples look like the targets of a possible Doepfer
> BBD-module, but they should be the starting point from where a
> developement goes further on.
>
> Florian
>
>
> Bakis Sirros wrote:
>
> > hello dieter,
> > ingo's idea of putting two different stages BBD's into
> > each module is great.
> > as i always say, the more capabilities, sockets and
> > knobs in a module, the better.
> > best regards,
> > bakis.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>