indeed. :D
bakis.




--- Anton Coops < dubshot@... > wrote:

> Hi Florian,
>
> If this BBD-manufacterer goes along I think Ingo's
> idea is good from
> a flexibility point of view, it would even be nicer
> if it were possible to
> have a sort of freqency-divider option for rhythmic
> variation, but lets
> face it: we're all gonna have to buy at least 2 bbd
> modules, whatever
> the end result may be... :-)
>
> Anton
>
> On 19 Oct 2005, at 11:52, Florian Anwander wrote:
>
> > Hi Bakis
> >
> > Hmm, sorry; perhaps now I spoil ingo's suggestion,
> but I think it would
> > be a waste of ressource.
> > If I have two BBDs, I want to modulate their clock
> from different
> > modulation sources in 80 percent of all cases.
> Lets take as example the
> > famous Roland chorus, which is two BBDs whereone
> is modulated direct by
> > the LFO the other by the inverted LFO signal.
> >
> > Either I'd like to have two separate modules or at
> least one module with
> > two separate delaylines. There are a lot of famous
> BBD-based devices
> > like the Dynacord TAM-21, the A/DA or the Roland
> Dimension-D. At the
> > moment these examples look like the targets of a
> possible Doepfer
> > BBD-module, but they should be the starting point
> from where a
> > developement goes further on.
> >
> > Florian
> >
> >
> > Bakis Sirros wrote:
> >
> > > hello dieter,
> > > ingo's idea of putting two different stages
> BBD's into
> > > each module is great.
> > > as i always say, the more capabilities, sockets
> and
> > > knobs in a module, the better.
> > > best regards,
> > > bakis.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Bakis Sirros
Parallel Worlds
Athens-Greece
1 group owner
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr



__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs