I have three Matrix-1000s. I have nothing against the 6r, and if you are really into programming it from the front panel, I might recommend that instead. However...

The only thing better than one Matrix-1000 is two. In stereo. Playing the same patch.

Sure you can split the 6r, but then you're left with only a few voices. Preset number 118 in stereo is twice as awesome as the same thing in mono. Plus you can easily extend the polyphony to 12 voices (or 18 like me) when you need more of a good thing. Patches with a long release sound truly awesome and you don't have to worry about voice stealing.

Sonically, I believe the primary difference is in how the oscillators are auto-tuned. But frankly, with matrix modulation you can duplicate any kinds of tuning irregularities you want that are more interesting and/or extreme with regard to random pitch variations.

If you are into MIDI guitar (like me), the Matrix-1000 is a perfect match with it's 6-voice mono mode.

I have really enjoyed the versatility of the Matrix-1000 and appreciate that I can fit three of them in the same space as a 6r. All three are right in front of me mounted in my studio desk next to a Waldorf XT. They make a great set of complimentary sounds altogether. -pc

p.s. Need more convincing Listen to this:

http://www.rhythmelectric.com/20060627/20060510-Atlantis.mp3

On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:32 PM, bob_at_work_2000 wrote:

> Hi group. I recently purchased an Oberheim 1000 and a 6R, listened to both and like what I hear, but think I only have room for one of these babies....decisions, decisions. Here is what I am weighing....1000 presets, editable via software in mono before external effects or 100 presets, editable via front panel or software, in possibly stereo or layered, but limited to 4/2 or 3/3 voice division. Sonically, the units seem the same although I have not tried an apples with apples voice comparison....so what are your thoughts on which I should keep
>
> Bob
> El Segundo, CA
>