-----Original Message-----
From: oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oberheim@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alen Rusko
Sent: 14 April 2010 08:44
To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [oberheim] Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision...

 

Definitely 6R!! You can get all Mx1000 programs on the internet, and you can load them via Midi. Also you can do split/layer with 6R!!!! Only thing that it has 127 RAM  program places less than Mx1000.(only drawback). Anyway, I'll go with 6R... Alen --- On Wed, 4/14/10, ogusa@... <ogusa@...> wrote: From: ogusa@... <ogusa@...> Subject: Re: [oberheim] Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... To: oberheim@yahoogroup s.com Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 5:49 AM   Gee the M1000 is only one rack space. That said, if you can spare the rack space keep the 6R. Bi-timbral/separate outs/front panel editing is definitely better. I have a M1000 because I can't spare the extra rack spaces. Only 2 banks of the M1000 are editable, the rest are ROM, though I just use sysex to tweak the ROM sounds as I go. Stublito Quoting bob_at_work_ 2000 < tttsystems@earthlin k.net >: > Hi group. I recently purchased an Oberheim 1000 and a 6R, listened > to both and like what I hear, but think I only have room for one of > these babies....decisions , decisions. Here is what I am > weighing.... 1000 presets, editable via software in mono before > external effects or 100 presets, editable via front panel or > software, in possibly stereo or layered, but limited to 4/2 or 3/3 > voice division. Sonically, the units seem the same although I have > not tried an apples with apples voice comparison.. ..so what are your > thoughts on which I should keep > > Bob > El Segundo, CA > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >